Cited by 30Wood Treatment and PropertiesStructural Engineering and Materials AnalysisCivil and Structural Engineering Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Non-Destructive Evaluation of the Mechanical Behavior of Chestnut Wood in Tension and Compression Parallel to Grain

Open access
Feio, Artur O., Lourenço, Paulo B., Machado, José S.·2007·International Journal of Architectural Heritage

Abstract

This article addresses the evaluation of the strength and stiffness of chestnut wood, in tension and compression parallel to the grain, using different non-destructive techniques (ultrasounds, Resistograph® and Pilodyn 6J). Approximately 200 timber specimens (divided into compression and tension tests) were tested up to failure, comprising recently sawn timber (which is now available on the market for structural purposes) and what was called old wood, obtained from structural elements belonging to ancient buildings. The possibility of predicting wood properties by application of non-destructive techniques is discussed based on simple linear regression models. Extrapolation of regression models obtained from recent cut wooden material to that obtained from old timber beams is analyzed. The results show reasonable correlations between mechanical elastic properties and non-destructive techniques (ultrasounds, Resistograph® and Pilodyn 6J). New and old wood mechanical data exhibited a scattered cloud of points, implying in terms of assessment of properties of timber elements in service by regression models that these models should not be supported only on data from recently sawn wood. Therefore, models combining information from new and old wood specimens are proposed based on lower 95% confidence limits of regression lines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15583050701300475

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The other analyzed researches reported no compressive strength variation [12][13][14][15]36], a slight increase [11,55,61] or a significant compressive strength increase [62,63].

    “The other analyzed researches reported no compressive strength variation [12][13][14][15]36],a slight increase [11,55,61] or a significant compressive strength increase [62,63].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 1994, Standard methods of testing small clear specimens of timber
  2. Bertolini, C., Brunetti, M., Cavallaro, P. and Macchioni, N. A non-destructive diagnostic method on ancient timber structures: some practical application examples. Proceedings of 5th world conference on timber engineering. Vol. I, pp.456–465. Montreux, Switzerland: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
  3. 10.1002/pse.170 · DOI
  4. Kuipers, J. Effect of age and/or load on timber strength. Recommendations for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage. 2001. Proceedings of 19th, Florence, Italy: ICOMOS. CIB-W18/19-6-1.
  5. Ross R., 1997, Forest Products Journal, 47, 89

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feio, A. O., Lourenço, P. B., & Machado, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (PT)
Corresponding author
Lourenço, Paulo B.
Venue
International Journal of Architectural Heritage
Published
2007-09-13
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
272-292
ISSN
  • 1558-3058 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-3066
OpenAlex
W2047323069
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Architectural Heritage (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering Research
Keywords
chestnut wood, non-destructive testing, tensile strength, compressive strength, stiffness, ultrasonic testing, resistograph, Pilodyn, old wood, structural timber, regression models, wood mechanical properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review