The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rubber-Toughened Epoxies: A Critical Review
Abstract
Epoxy resins have been used as structural materials since the late 1940s. Despite their desirable properties such as high strength, excellent creep resistance, and good adhesion, they suffer from low fracture energy. Rubber modification as a major toughening approach to overcome the inherent brittleness of epoxy polymers was introduced during the early 1970s. Since then, a large number of investigations have been conducted to elucidate different aspects of rubber-toughened epoxies. The present work is a critical review of the field focusing on the important parameters affecting rubber-toughening. The studies reviewed are classified in five categories including roles of matrix ductility, rubber concentration, blend morphology, particle cavitation, and particle/matrix interface. It has been tried to provide an in-depth view of the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field and to direct future studies towards exploring new approaches for toughening of epoxy polymers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the origins of morphological complexity in block copolymer surfactants
Jain, S., & Bates, F. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082193 · Cited by 1,217
Bucknall, C. B. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-5349-4 · Cited by 1,189
Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies: Part 1 Mechanical studies
Yee, A. F., & Pearson, R. A. (1986) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf01114293 · Cited by 857
Self-citationBlock copolymers in tomorrow's plastics
Ruzette, A.-V., & Leibler, L. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1295 · Cited by 749
Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies: Part 3 The effect of cross-link density
Pearson, R. A., & Yee, A. F. (1989) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf01174528 · Cited by 724
Self-citationEffect of rubber particle size on deformation mechanisms in glassy epoxy
Sultan, J. N., & McGarry, F. J. (1973) · Polymer Engineering & Science · doi:10.1002/pen.760130105 · Cited by 644
Pearson, R. A., & Yee, A. F. (1991) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf01184979 · Cited by 537
Self-citationFailure mechanisms in toughened epoxy resins—A review
Garg, A. C., & Mai, Y. (1988) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-7 · Cited by 485
The fracture of epoxy- and elastomer-modified epoxy polymers in bulk and as adhesives
Bascom, W. D., Cottington, R. L., Jones, R. L., & Peyser, P. (1975) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.1975.070190917 · Cited by 483
Nanostructured Thermosets from Self-Assembled Amphiphilic Block Copolymer/Epoxy Resin Mixtures
Lipic, P. M., Bates, F. S., & Hillmyer, M. A. (1998) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja981544s · Cited by 454
Cited by
A Review on Rubber-Enhanced Polymeric Materials
Caldona, E. B., De Leon, A. C. C., Pajarito, B. B., & Advincula, R. C. (2017) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2016.1247102 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagheri, R., Marouf, B. T., & Pearson, R. A.
- Venue
- Polymer Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-225
- ISSN
- 0736-6574 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3724
- 1558-3716
- OpenAlex
- W2082363944
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rubber-Toughened Epoxies: A Critical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15583720903048227
- The paper
- Bagheri, R., Marouf, B. T., & Pearson, R. A. (2009). Rubber-Toughened Epoxies: A Critical Review. Polymer Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583720903048227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.