Cited by 26Insect Pest Control StrategiesInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlInsect Resistance and Genetics

Exposure to polyphenol-rich purple corn pericarp extract restricts fall armyworm(Spodoptera frugiperda)growth

Open access
Singh, Sukhman, Kariyat, Rupesh R.·2020·Plant Signaling & Behavior

Abstract

Bioactive compounds such as polyphenols in plants have been well studied for their potential insecticidal activities. These are considered as safe alternatives against chemical pesticides because of their lower persistence in environment, lower toxicity to humans and other organisms. However, they are present constitutively in lower amounts in plants and have to undergo complicated extraction methods – hampering their commercial exploitation in pest management. Using an inexpensive extraction method developed to recover polyphenol-rich liquid extract from purple corn pericarp, we recently documented that this extract has anti-feeding effects that cascade from larval to adult stages in a model herbivore tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta). However, M. sexta does not feed on corn or any other major crops other than the species in the nightshade family (Solanaceae). In this study, we explored the same idea but using a generalist and common herbivore on corn, the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). We found that purple corn pericarp extract inhibited the larval growth and development as well as negatively affected the pupal stages of S. frugiperda. However, unlike on M. sexta, time to complete larval life cycle was unaffected. Our findings confirm the toxicity of this extract on a generalist, economically important herbivore, but also suggest potential species-specific effects that should be explored further.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15592324.2020.1784545

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 26

Authors
Singh, S., & Kariyat, R. R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Corresponding author
Kariyat, Rupesh R.
Venue
Plant Signaling & Behavior
Published
2020-06-24
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
1784545
ISSN
  • 1559-2316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2324
OpenAlex
W3038113224
Cited by
26
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Signaling & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
Funders
project was through startup funds to Dr. Rupesh Kariyat by The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, TX, USA
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
polyphenols, Spodoptera frugiperda, larval growth inhibition, antifeedant activity, botanical insecticides, alternative pest control, generalist herbivores, pupal development, species-specific effects, maize pests
MeSH terms
Animals, Zea mays, Pest Control, Plant Extracts, Spodoptera, Polyphenols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review