Mapping and Complicating Conversations about Indigenous Education
Abstract
In this article I offer a series of critical reflections about existing efforts and achievements in Indigenous Education, with particular emphasis on the risks, tensions, and paradoxes that arise where different knowledge systems meet, and when Indigenous peoples ourselves hold contradictory educational desires. I focus on the idea of the land as first teacher and on the difficulties of enabling institutional educational processes that conceptualize it as a living entity, rather than an object, a resource a property. I seek to complicate our conversations to take account of the ways that colonial interests, competing investments, and structures of schooling shape the education that Indigenous youth today receive, and how this circumscribes the kinds of education it is possible for us to imagine. I conclude by offering a cartography that enables us to map how Indigenous youth encounter different ideologies of education and schooling, I also offer some thoughts about pedagogical possibilities that emerged from a course in which students were invited by Elders to witness a Sun Dance ceremony in Turtle Island.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The history of epistemic violence and epistemic ignorance within the academic world has often meant that Western knowledge and worldviews retain a highly disproportionate amount of influence such that any effort to put them into conversation with Indigenous knowledge must be acutely aware of this historical and ongoing imbalance.
“The history of 'epistemic violence' and 'epistemic ignorance' (Kuokkanen, 2008) within the academic world has often meant that 'Western knowledge and worldviews retain a highly disproportionate amount of influence such that any effort to put them into conversation with Indigenous knowledge must be acutely aware of this historical and ongoing imbalance' (Ahenakew, 2017, p. 86).”
From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as Ahenakew, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother
Goodchild, M. (2021) · Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change · doi:10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.577 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings
Mbah, M. F., & Jarvis, L. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2626631 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ahenakew, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ahenakew, Cash Richard
- Venue
- Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-91
- ISSN
- 1559-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2583603641
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diaspora Indigenous and Minority Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2015-0358)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
- Keywords
- indigenous education, indigenous knowledge, colonialism in education, Indigenous youth, Sun Dance, older adults, Turtle Island, pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review