Cited by 40Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

A single session of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex influences attentional control in depressed patients

Vanderhasselt, Marie-anne, de Raedt, Rudi, Baeken, Chris, Leyman, Lemke, D'haenen, Hugo·2009·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Depressed patients are impaired in the ability to shift their focus of attention. This attentional control process is related to dysfunctions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). It has been proposed that a dorsal circuit plays an important role in the interaction between emotional and attentional information processing. However, because the different emphasis of fundamental cognitive neuroscience research and clinical research of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the DLPFC, little research has been done on the effects of rTMS on cognitive functioning after a single stimulation session to explore the neural systems underlying depression. This study was conducted as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, within subjects design. Sixteen depressed patients performed a modified task switching paradigm, before and after receiving high frequency (HF) versus placebo rTMS over the left DLPFC. One session of HF-rTMS over the left DLPFC had a specific beneficial effect on task-switching performance, whereas mood remained stable. Antidepressant effects of rTMS could be related to the same neurochemical changes that underlie cognitive functioning. Therefore, task switching performance may provide a unique window into the extent of antidepressant effects which can be considered as second-order long-term effects possibly related to primary alternations in cognitive functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15622970701816514

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have shown successful sustained attentional enhancements in depressed samples via TMS, rTMS, and tDCS.

    “Multiple studies have shown successful sustained attentional enhancements in depressed samples via TMS133, rTMS134, and tDCS135.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [134]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 40

Authors
Vanderhasselt, M.-A., de Raedt, R., Baeken, C., Leyman, L., & D'haenen, H.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanderhasselt, Marie-anne
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
34-42
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
OpenAlex
W2136336487
Cited by
40
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, depression, attentional control, task switching, high-frequency rTMS, single-session stimulation, cognitive function, antidepressant effects, mood
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Placebos, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Cross-Over Studies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review