Cited by 47Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and EffectsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxiolytics targeting GABA A receptors: Insights on etifoxine

Open access
Poisbeau, Pierrick, Gazzo, Geraldine, Calvel, Laurent·2018·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Anxiety and adjustment disorders are among the most prevalent mental health conditions. This review focuses on γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A (GABAAR)-mediated anxiolysis, describing the action of both endogenous and exogenous modulators of GABAAR. Future directions and innovative strategies to alleviate anxiety symptoms are discussed, with a particular emphasis on etifoxine.Methods: We used available data from the recent literature to update the mode of action of anxiolytics. We focussed our search on anxiolytics acting at GABAARs, as well as on the pharmacological properties of formerly and currently prescribed anxiolytics.Results: Considering the adverse effects of current treatments aimed at increasing inhibitory controls, optimisation of existing pharmacotherapies is of crucial importance. Among the alternative compounds targeting the GABAergic system, translocator protein (TSPO) ligands, such as etifoxine (EFX), which promote endogenous neurosteroidogenesis, are emerging as promising candidates for anxiety relief. In several papers comparing the efficacy of benzodiazepines and EFX, EFX showed interesting properties with limited side effects. Indeed, neurosteroids are potent GABAAR modulators with highly underrated anxiolytic properties.Conclusions: Novel therapeutic strategies have been emerging following the recognition of neurosteroids as potent anxiolytics. Featured at the top of the list for well-tolerated anxiety relief, TSPO ligands such as etifoxine appear promising.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15622975.2018.1468030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 47

Authors
Poisbeau, P., Gazzo, G., & Calvel, L.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and University of Strasbourg, Institute for Cellular and Integrative Neuroscience (INCI)
Corresponding author
Poisbeau, Pierrick
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Published
2018-06-22
Volume
19
Issue
sup1
Pages
S36-S45
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
OpenAlex
W2890503810
Cited by
47
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
etifoxine, GABAA receptor, anxiolytics, anxiety disorders, neurosteroids, benzodiazepines, GABAergic system, adjustment disorder
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Oxazines, Receptors, GABA-A, Anti-Anxiety Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review