CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Assessment and Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

No Child Left Behind and the quest for educational equity: The role of teachers’ collective sense of efficacy

Evans, Andrea·2009·Leadership and Policy in Schools
DOI 10.1080/15700760802416081
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The current policy context established by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) calls for schools and teachers to develop and execute plans of action they believe will effectively address achievement gaps. This article uses conceptual and research literature to explore the construct of teachers' collective sense of efficacy and its potential influence on schools' efforts to respond to the equity mandate of NCLB. Specifically, I explore the relationship between teachers' collective sense of efficacy, accountability policy, and student achievement. I also examine the school leader's role in mediating policy, teachers' sense of efficacy, and school contexts in ways that can positively address educational inequities. Finally, I conclude with several implications for school leadership, policy, and future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15700760802416081

Cites

67 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Darling-Hammond L., 2005, Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The one hundred and fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 289
  2. Debray E., 2001, From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. The one hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 170
  3. Duke D., 1995, The school that refused to die
  4. Haertel E. H., 2005, Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The one hundred and fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 1
  5. Hill H. C., 2006, New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity, 65
  6. Linn R. L., 2005, Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The one hundred and fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 78
  7. Malen B., 2006, New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity, 83
  8. Russell M. L., 2005, The Negro Educational Review, 56, 167
  9. Spillane J. P., 2006, New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity, 47
  10. Valencia R. R., 1997, The Stanford series on education and public policy
  11. Weiss J. A., 1990, Choice and control in American education, Volume I: The theory of choice and control in education, 91

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Evans, A.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Evans, Andrea
Venue
Leadership and Policy in Schools
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-01-23
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
64-91
ISSN
  • 1570-0763 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5043
DOI
10.1080/15700760802416081
OpenAlex
W2028948345
Cited by
37
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Leadership and Policy in Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
No Child Left Behind Act, educational equity, educational accountability policy, achievement gap, school leadership, academic performance, school context, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review