The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategic flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to guide a sound approach
Abstract
Over recent decades, remarkable progress in cultivating the concepts of flood risk management has taken place across countries as diverse as India, China, Australia, the UK and the USA. This change highlights a risk management paradigm as potentially more complex than a more traditional standard-based approach as it involves ‘whole systems’ and ‘whole-life’ thinking; yet this is also its main strength – paving the way for more integrated and informed decision-making. Strategic flood management (SFM) uses a portfolio of responses to manage flood risks and promote opportunities ecosystem services. It recognizes the interrelationships between the actions taken and the contribution flood management provides to integrated river basin and coastal zone planning. The paper results from an international collaborative effort for research and distils approaches to flood risk and water management in challenging large-scale and complex environments. The paper provides an overview of the emerging good practice in SFM, including (i) an analysis of the flood events that have shaped changes in approach, (ii) the purpose and characteristics of modern SFM, (iii) the goals, objectives and outcomes sought and (iv) the challenges associated with implementation (together with some of the common pitfalls and misconceptions). Our conclusions are encapsulated in a set of ‘golden rules’ that underpin sound SFM decision-making.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the onset of the cycle is flood management policy, which develops in response to national priorities (e.g.environmental, agricultural, urban development, cultural resources), the influence of societal values and the perception of flood risk to different stakeholders (DEFRA 2005, NRC 1999, Sayers et al. 2015).”
From Towards integrated flood management along the lower Rhine and Mississippi Rivers and the international legacy of the 2005 New Orleans Hurricanes Katrina–Rita flood disaster (2018) · cites this paper as Sayers et al. 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226 · DOI
- Bosher L., 2007, Realising a resilient and sustainable built environment: towards a strategic agenda for the United Kingdom
- 10.2307/976725 · DOI
- Defra, 2005, Making space for water: taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management forward in England
- Environment Agency, 2012. Greater working with natural processes in flood and coastal erosion risk management: a response to Pitt Review recommendation 27 [online]. London: Environment Agency. Available from: http://a0768b4a8a31e106d8b0-50dc802554eb38a24458b98ff72d550b.r19.cf3.rackcdn.com/geho0811buci-e-e.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2013].
- 10.1007/978-94-007-2226-2_15 · DOI
- Evans E.P., 2004, Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 2: managing future risks
- Evans E.P., 2004, Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 1: future risks and their drivers
- 10.1139/L09-173 · DOI
- Green C.H., 2003, Handbook of water economics
- 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(126) · DOI
- Hall, J.W. et al., 2003b. A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Proc. ICE: Water and Maritime Engineering, 156 (3), 235–247. · DOI
- 10.1680/ensu.12.00028 · DOI
- 10.1680/rauids.32705 · DOI
- 10.1061/41114(371)483 · DOI
- Kunreuther H., 2012, Encyclopedia of energy, natural resources and environmental economics, 3, 52
- McGahey, C. and Sayers, P., 2008. Long term planning – robust strategic decision-making in the face of gross uncertainty – tools and application to the Thames. Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice. Proceedings of FLOODrisk 2008, 30 September–2 October. Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 1543–1553 (on CD).
- Milly, P. et al., 2008. Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science [online], 319, 573–574. Available from: http://wwwpaztcn.wr.usgs.gov/julio_pdf/milly_et_al.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2012]. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00325-7 · DOI
- Samuels, P. et al., 2010. Framework for integrated flood risk management. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, European Congress, May 2010, Edinburgh. Available from: http://web.sbe.hw.ac.uk/staffprofiles/bdgsa/IAHR_2010_European_Congress/Papers%20by%20session%20final/Flood%20Management%20III/FMaIIIa.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2013].
- Sayers P., 2002, ICE Journal of Civil Engineering 2002, 150, 36
- 10.1002/9781444324846.ch15 · DOI
- 10.1680/fr.41561.281 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-4598-1_1 · DOI
- Talling P., 2011, London's lost rivers
- Tarrant, O. and Sayers, P., 2012. Managing flood risk in the Thames Estuary – the development of a long term robust and flexible strategy (P. Sayers, ed). London: Thomas Telford. doi: 10.1680/fr.41561. Format: Hardbound, Electronic Hardbound. · DOI
- United Nations (UN, 1992, Rio Declaration and Agenda 21
- US National Research Council (NRC, 2012, Disaster resilience: a national imperative
- US National Research Council (NRC, 2012, Dam and levee safety and community resilience: a vision for future practice
- US National Research Council (NRC, 2013, Levees and the National Flood Insurance program
- 10.1177/0956247813501121 · DOI
- Willows, R.I. and Connell, R.K., 2003. Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report. Oxford: UKCIP.
- World Commission on Economic Development (WCED, 1987, Our common future
- 10.1111/jfr3.12034 · DOI
- Yang, S.L. et al., 2005. Impact of dams on Yangtze River sediment supply to the sea and delta intertidal wetland response. Journal of the American Geophysical Union [online]. Available from: http://myweb.uiowa.edu/ipeate/downloads/Yangtze.pdf [Accessed 12 December 2013]. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan
Tickner, D., Opperman, J. J., Abell, R., Acreman, M., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Cooke, S. J., Dalton, J., Darwall, W., Edwards, G., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa002 · Cited by 1,241
Hudson, P. F. (2018) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2017.1411921 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sayers, P., Galloway, G., Penning-Rowsell, E., Yuanyuan, L., Fuxin, S., Yiwei, C., Kang, W., Le Quesne, T., Wang, L., & Guan, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sayers and Partners, 24a High Street, Watlington OX49 5PY, UK
- Glenn L. Martin Institute Professor of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
- Professor of Geography, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London, UK
- Vice-President, Professor and Senior Engineer of the General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design, Ministry of Water Resources, People's Republic of China
- Professor-level Senior Engineer in the General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design, Ministry of Water Resources, People's Republic of China
- Engineer in the General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design, Ministry of Water Resources, People's Republic of China
- Senior Engineer and Former Director of the Flood Control Research Division at the Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Ministry of Water Resources, People's Republic of China
- Senior Policy Advisor, WWF-UK, Godalming, UK
- Freshwater Programme, WWF-China, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Venue
- International Journal of River Basin Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-04-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-151
- ISSN
- 1571-5124
- 1814-2060
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
