Cited by 24Water Resource Management and QualityWater Governance and InfrastructureEnvironmental Science and Water Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The He-Zhang (River chief/keeper) system: An innovation in China’s water governance and management

Liu, Dengwei, Richards, Keith·2019·International Journal of River Basin Management

Abstract

Governing and managing water sustainably is a critical issue globally. Given its rapid economic development and the effects of global climate change, China faces serious water challenges including water shortages and pollution. The Chinese government has long been considering governance reforms which will improve water and river management. Conscious of the negative effects of fragmented institutions and the lack of incentives to support environmentally-sustainable management, China has recently established and implemented the ‘He-Zhang’ system - a network of River Chiefs and River Keepers across the country and at all administrative levels. This paper outlines the origins, purpose and structure of the system; summarizes progress with its implementation; and identifies some of its future challenges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15715124.2018.1546716

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Chen Yiyu, 2007, Strategic study on integrated management of China's river basins
  2. Dong Z, 2005, China Water Resources, 10, 17
  3. Li Xianming, 2017, Hebei Water Conversation, 23
  4. Lu Xinshe, 2017, China Water Resources, 2, 4
  5. Ma Jun, 2004, China's water crisis (voices of Asia)
  6. Wang Dongfeng, 2017, Hebei Water Resources, 4, 2
  7. Xia Baolong, 2017, China Water Resources, 2, 8
  8. Zeng Weng, 2008, Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 6, 98

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, D., & Richards, K.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Liu, Dengwei
Venue
International Journal of River Basin Management
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
263-270
ISSN
  • 1571-5124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-2060
OpenAlex
W2900698104
Cited by
24
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of River Basin Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Scholarship Council Fund (201709110069)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
Keywords
river chief system, water governance, river management, institutional reform, water pollution, water scarcity, China, sustainable water management, multi-level governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review