Cited by 27Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The prevalence of substance use disorders among community-based adults with legal problems in the U.S

Open access
Moore, Kelly E., Oberleitner, Lindsay, Pittman, Brian P., Roberts, Walter, Verplaetse, Terril L., Hacker, Robyn L., Peltier, MacKenzie R., McKee, Sherry A.·2020·Addiction Research & Theory

Abstract

Kelly E. Mooreab* , Lindsay Oberleitnerb, Brian P. Pittmanb, Walter Robertsb, Terril L. Verplaetseb, Robyn L. Hackerc, MacKenzie R. Peltierb & Sherry A. McKeeba Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA; b Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; c Center for Dependency, Addiction, and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Boulder, Aurora, CO, USASupplemental data for this article can be accessed here.CONTACT Kelly E. Moore mooreke2@etsu.edu Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, 420 Rogers-Stout Hall, P.O. Box 70649, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.AbstractBackground: Current national prevalence estimates of DSM-5 diagnosed substance use disorders (SUDs) among adults with justice system involvement are lacking.Methods: This study drew from NESARC-III data (n = 36,309; 2012–2013), a nationally representative U.S. sample, to examine current and lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD) and drug use disorder (DUD) diagnoses among adults reporting current or prior drug-related, alcohol-related, and general legal problems.Results: Adults reporting current alcohol-related legal problems were 22 times more likely to have a current AUD diagnosis (AOR = 22.0, 95% CI = 12.1; 40.1) and 15 times more likely to have had a lifetime AUD diagnosis (AOR = 15.2, 95% CI = 7.5; 30.9) than adults without alcohol-related legal problems. Adults with lifetime drug-related legal problems were 3–5 times more likely to have a current (AOR = 2.6, 95% CI = 2.1; 3.2) and lifetime (AOR = 5.1, 95% CI = 4.3; 6.1) DUD diagnosis, with stimulant use disorder being the most prevalent (AOR = 5.4, 95% CI = 4.5; 6.5). Adults with general legal problems were around 3 times more likely to have a current AUD (AOR = 3.2, 95% CI = 2.6; 4.0) or DUD (AOR = 3.5, 95% CI = 2.8; 4.4). Women with any type of legal problem were more likely to have SUD diagnoses than men.Conclusions: SUD diagnoses are prevalent among adults reporting legal problems, particularly those involving alcohol. There is a continued need for community-based addiction prevention and intervention efforts, especially for women with justice system involvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16066359.2019.1613524

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Baley JW, & Hoffman NG (2015). The impact of the proposed changes for the DSM-5 on diagnoses of first-time DUI/DWI offenders. Substance Use and Misuse, 50, 1747– 1752. 26646360
  2. Blumstein A (2011). Bringing down the U.S. prison population. The Prison Journal, 91, 12S– 26S.
  3. Caetano R, & McGrath C (2005). Driving under the influence (DUI) among U.S. ethnic groups. Accident: Analysis and Prevention, 37, 217– 224. 15667807
  4. Fearn NE, Vaughn MG, Nelson EJ, Salas-Wright CP, Qian C, & DeLisi M (2016). Trends and correlates of substance use disorders among probationers and parolees in the United States 2002–2014. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 128– 139. 27515722 PMC5037016
  5. Gillespie NA, Neale MC, Prescott CA, Aggen SH, & Kendler KS (2007). Factor and item response analysis of DSM-IV criteria for abuse of and dependence on cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, sedatives, stimulants, and opioids. Addiction, 102, 920– 930. 17523987
  6. Hasin DS, Greenstein E, Aivadyan C, Stohl M, Aharonovich E, Saha T, Goldstein R, Nunes EV, Jung J, Zhang H, & Grant BF (2015). The alcohol use disorder and associated disabilities interview schedule-5 (AUDADIS-5): Procedural validity of substance use disorders modules through clinical re-appraisal in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 148, 40– 46. 25604321 PMC4330104
  7. Hunt E, Peters RH, & Kremling J (2015). Behavioral health treatment history among persons in the justice system: Findings from the arrestee drug abuse monitoring II program. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 38, 7– 15. 25799302
  8. Ihongbe TO, & Masho SW (2016). Prevalence, correlates and patterns of heroin use among young adults in the United States. Addictive Behavior, 63, 74– 81. 27424167
  9. Kouri EM, Pope HG, Powell KF & Oliva PS (1997). Drug use history and criminal behavior among 133 incarcerated men. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 413– 419. 9261489
  10. Lapham SC, Stout R, Laxton G, & Skipper BJ (2011). Persistence of addictive disorders in a first-offender driving while impaired population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 1151– 1157. 21727248 PMC3210885
  11. Nyamathi AM, Salen BE, Farabee D, Hall E, Zhang S, Marifisee M, Khalilifard F, Musto S, Faucette M, & Leake B (2014). Correlates of heroin and methamphetamine use among homeless male ex-jail and prison offenders. Addiction Research & Theory, 22, 463– 473. 25489295 PMC4257470
  12. Authors (in press). Psychiatric disorders and crime in the U.S population. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.
  13. Palamar JJ, Davies S, Ompad DC, Cleland CM, & Weitzman M (2015). Powder cocaine and crack use in the United States: An examination of risk for arrest and socioeconomic disparities in use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 149, 108– 116. 25702933 PMC4533860
  14. Pilkinton MW, Robertson A, & McCluskey DL (2013). Drugged driving: increased traffic risks involving licit and illicit substances. Journal of Drug Education, 43, 183– 201. 25068170
  15. Proctor SL (2012). Substance use disorder prevalence among female state prison inmates. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38, 278– 285. 22443915
  16. Sirotich F (2008). Correlates of crime and violence among persons with mental disorder: An evidence based review. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 8, 171– 194.
  17. Skogens L, Greigg N, Berlin M, & Bergmark A (2018). A 30-year follow up of substance-misusers in Sweden – differences in predictors of mortality between women and men Addiction Research and Theory. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1518435 · DOI
  18. Stanforth ET, Kostiuk M, & Garriott PO (2016). Correlates of engaging in drug distribution in a national sample. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 30, 138– 146. 26502336
  19. Tarter RE, Kirisci L, Mezzich A, & Patton D (2011). Multivariate comparison of male and female adolescent substance abusers with accompanying legal problems. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 207– 211. 21686313 PMC3113474
  20. Wu LT, Brady KT, Mannelli P, Kileen TK (2014). Cannabis use disorders are comparatively prevalent among nonwhite racial/ethnic groups and adolescents: A national study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 50, 26– 35. 24342767 PMC3941308

Cited by

Authors
Moore, K. E., Oberleitner, L., Pittman, B. P., Roberts, W., Verplaetse, T. L., Hacker, R. L., Peltier, M. R., & McKee, S. A.
Affiliations
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Moore, Kelly E.
Venue
Addiction Research & Theory
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
165-172
ISSN
  • 1058-6989 (ISSN-L)
  • 1606-6359
  • 1476-7392
OpenAlex
W2946903654
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction Research & Theory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (26-12)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
substance use disorders, criminal justice involvement, alcoholism, drug use disorders, legal issues, stimulant use disorder, prevalence, lifetime prevalence, community-dwelling adults, NESARC-III, substance use disorder screening, addiction treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review