Cited by 15Probiotics and Fermented FoodsViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in the paediatric population: a systematic review

Open access
Padayachee, Morgambal, Visser, Janicke, Viljoen, Estelle, Musekiwa, Alfred, Blaauw, Renée·2019·South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Context: Gastroenteritis (GE) remains the second major cause of death in the most vulnerable of the world’s populations. Potential treatments include the use of probiotics, with the yeast Saccharomyces boulardii being one such option.Objectives: The primary objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in the treatment of acute GE in the paediatric population.Method: Major electronic databases were searched from April 2014 to January 2015. Additional literature was obtained through hand-searching and reviewing of reference lists of articles and other systematic reviews. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in a hospital setting, involving participants < 16 years were used as the data source. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, assessed study quality and performed data extraction. Review Manager 5 was used to analyse data and a random-effects model of meta-analysis was applied owing to heterogeneity.Results: Ten of 190 articles were selected for final inclusion. A meta-analysis of five of the included studies showed that Saccharomyces boulardii compared with the control significantly shortened the duration of diarrhoea (in days) (MD –0.57, 95% CI –0.83 to –0.30, p < 0.0001), but there was no difference between groups regarding time to achieving formed stools. No adverse effects were reported. The GRADE tool assessed overall methodological quality as moderate.Conclusion: Saccharomyces boulardii showed a potential benefit in treating acute GE in the paediatric patient. A dose of 250 mg 1–2 times per day for up to 5 days showed some benefit and appears safe. Larger, rigorous RCTs are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in order to offer specific treatment guidelines.Trial registration: CRD42014009913.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16070658.2018.1449378

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review that summarised trials of S boulardii in children with rotavirus diarrhoea (n = 548 children; five RCTs) reported a modest reduction in diarrhoea duration (MD -0.57 days; 95% CI -0.83 to -0.30) with consistency in findings (I2 = 0%) and moderate certainty evidence.

    “A recent systematic review that summarised trials of S boulardii in children with rotavirus diarrhoea (n = 548 children; five RCTs) reported a modest reduction in diarrhoea duration (MD –0.57 days; 95% CI –0.83 to –0.30) with consistency in findings (I2 = 0%) and moderate certainty evidence (Padayachee 2019).”

    From Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea (2020) · cites this paper as Padayachee 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padayachee, M., Visser, J., Viljoen, E., Musekiwa, A., & Blaauw, R.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Padayachee, Morgambal
Venue
South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2018-04-12
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
58-69
ISSN
  • 1607-0658 (ISSN-L)
  • 2221-1268
OpenAlex
W2798141018
Cited by
15
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Saccharomyces boulardii, acute gastroenteritis, pediatric gastroenteritis, probiotics, diarrhea duration, treatment efficacy, drug safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review