The effects of a coping intervention on coping self-efficacy, coping effectiveness, and subjective performance among adolescent soccer players
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the effects of a coping effectiveness training for adolescent soccer players (CETASP) intervention on coping self-efficacy (CSE), coping effectiveness (CE), and subjective performance. The participants were five male soccer players aged between 13 and 14 years (M = 13.6, SD = 0.55), who played for an English Premier League Soccer Academy. A single-subject multiple-baseline, across individuals design was employed. Results suggested that participants' CSE, CE, and subjective performance improved as a result of the CETASP intervention. Additionally, the social validation findings indicated that the participants were satisfied with the development of their coping skills and enjoyed the CETASP. This study provides empirical support for a framework that applied practitioners can use in “real world” settings to develop effective coping among academy soccer players.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSE is considered a promising intervention mechanism mediating the impact of trauma and stress on adolescent functioning and well-being.
“On the other hand, coping self-efficacy (CSE) specifically reflects one’s cognitive appraisal of their ability to manage emotions and stress (Benight & Bandura, 2004; Chesney et al., 2006) and is considered a promising intervention mechanism mediating the impact of trauma and stress on adolescent functioning and well-being (DeCou et al., 2019; Liu & Kia-Keating, 2018; Reeves et al., 2011).”
From Intervention development to improve foster youth mental health by targeting coping self-efficacy and help-seeking (2023) · cites this paper as Reeves et al., 2011
Cites
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947 · see citing works
A validity and reliability study of the coping self‐efficacy scale
Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910705x53155 · Cited by 942 · cited 8× · see citing works
“During the baseline phase of the study, participants completed the CSES (Chesney et al., 2006) one hour prior to competing in academy matches and the CE questionnaire (Gottlieb & Rooney, 2004) and subjective performance scale within one hour after the match.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCoping effectiveness training for men living with HIV: Preliminary findings
Chesney, M., Folkman, S., & Chambers, D. (1996) · International Journal of STD & AIDS · doi:10.1258/0956462961917690 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blakeslee, J. E., Kothari, B. H., & Miller, R. A. (2023) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106753 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reeves, C. W., Nicholls, A. R., & McKenna, J.
- Affiliations
- Leeds Beckett University (GB)
- University of Hull (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nicholls, Adam R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-142
- ISSN
- 1557-251X (ISSN-L)
- 1612-197X
- OpenAlex
- W2083544152
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- coping interventions, coping self-efficacy, coping effectiveness, perceived performance, adolescent soccer players, youth soccer academies, sport psychology training, social validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
