EFFECTS OF VISUAL FEEDBACK THERAPY ON POSTURAL CONTROL IN BILATERAL STANDING AFTER STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether bilateral standing with visual feedback therapy after stroke improves postural control compared with conventional therapy and to evaluate the generalization of the effects of visual feedback therapy on gait and gait-related activities. DESIGN: A systematic review. METHODS: A computer-aided literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials, comparing visual feedback therapy with conventional balance treatments were included up to April 2005. The methodological quality of each study was assessed with the the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Depending on existing heterogeneity, studies with a common variable of outcome were pooled by calculating the summary effect-sizes using fixed or random effects models. RESULTS: Eight out of 78 studies, presenting 214 subjects, were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The methodological quality ranged from 3 to 6 points. The meta-analysis demonstrated non-significant summary effect-sizes in favour of visual feedback therapy for weight distribution and postural sway, as well as balance and gait performance, and gait speed. CONCLUSION: The additional value of visual feedback therapy in bilateral standing compared with conventional therapy shows no statistically significant effects on symmetry of weight distribution between paretic and non-paretic leg, postural sway in bilateral standing, gait and gait-related activities. Visual feedback therapy should not be favoured over conventional therapy. The question remains as to exactly how asymmetry in weight distribution while standing is related to balance control in patients with stroke.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The perceived relationship between symmetry in weight distribution while standing and walking and balance has not been proven.
“Bobath therapists have assumed that a symmetrical weight distribution implies better postural control, but this perceived relationship between symmetry in weight distribution while standing and walking and balance has not been proven.56,[63][64][65]”
From The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence? (2009) · cites this paper as [56]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Van Peppen, R., Kortsmit, M., Lindeman, E., & Kwakkel, G.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- ORCID
- Kwakkel, Gert
- Venue
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Publisher
- Medical Journals Sweden AB
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-9
- ISSN
- 1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103364651
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- stroke, postural control, balance, postural sway, gait, walking speed, stroke rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Postural Balance, Gait, Humans, Middle Aged, Visual Perception, Recovery of Function, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review