Cited by 50Digital Mental Health InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Self-help interventions for adjustment disorder problems: a randomized waiting-list controlled study in a sample of burglary victims

Bachem, Rahel, Maercker, Andreas·2016·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Adjustment disorders (AjD) are among the most frequent mental disorders yet often remain untreated. The high prevalence, comparatively mild symptom impairment, and transient nature make AjD a promising target for low-threshold self-help interventions. Bibliotherapy represents a potential treatment for AjD problems. This study investigates the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral self-help manual specifically directed at alleviating AjD symptoms in a homogenous sample of burglary victims. Participants with clinical or subclinical AjD symptoms following experience of burglary were randomized to an intervention group (n = 30) or waiting-list control group (n = 24). The new explicit stress response syndrome model for diagnosing AjD was applied. Participants received no therapist support and assessments took place at baseline, after the one-month intervention, and at three-month follow-up. Based on completer analyses, group by time interactions indicated that the intervention group showed more improvement in AjD symptoms of preoccupation and in post-traumatic stress symptoms. Post-intervention between-group effect sizes ranged from Cohen's d = .17 to .67 and the proportion of participants showing reliable change was consistently higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Engagement with the self-help manual was high: 87% of participants had worked through at least half the manual. This is the first published RCT of a bibliotherapeutic self-help intervention for AjD problems. The findings provide evidence that a low-threshold self-help intervention without therapist contact is a feasible and effective treatment for symptoms of AjD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2016.1191083

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 50

Authors
Bachem, R., & Maercker, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ,
Corresponding author
Bachem, Rahel
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2016-06-14
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
397-413
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2428627609
Cited by
50
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adjustment disorder, self-help intervention, bibliotherapy, posttraumatic stress symptoms, low-threshold treatment, trauma response
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adjustment Disorders, Adult, Aged, Bibliotherapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Theft, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review