The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Tolerance: Therapeutic Implications for Autoimmune Diseases
Open accessAbstract
Oral tolerance is classically defined as the suppression of immune responses to antigens (Ag) that have been administered previously by the oral route. Multiple mechanisms of tolerance are induced by oral Ag. Low doses favor active suppression, whereas higher doses favor clonal anergy/deletion. Oral Ag induces Th2 (IL‐4/IL‐10) and Th3 (TGF‐β) regulatory T cells (Tregs) plus CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells and LAP+T cells. Induction of oral tolerance is enhanced by IL‐4, IL‐10, anti‐IL‐12, TGF‐β, cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), Flt‐3 ligand, anti‐CD40 ligand and continuous feeding of Ag. In addition to oral tolerance, nasal tolerance has also been shown to be effective in suppressing inflammatory conditions with the advantage of a lower dose requirement. Oral and nasal tolerance suppress several animal models of autoimmune diseases including experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), uveitis, thyroiditis, myasthenia, arthritis and diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse, plus non‐autoimmune diseases such as asthma, atherosclerosis, colitis and stroke. Oral tolerance has been tested in human autoimmune diseases including MS, arthritis, uveitis and diabetes and in allergy, contact sensitivity to DNCB, nickel allergy. Positive results have been observed in phase II trials and new trials for arthritis, MS and diabetes are underway. Mucosal tolerance is an attractive approach for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases because of lack of toxicity, ease of administration over time and Ag‐specific mechanism of action. The successful application of oral tolerance for the treatment of human diseases will depend on dose, developing immune markers to assess immunologic effects, route (nasal versus oral), formulation, mucosal adjuvants, combination therapy and early therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., Konowal, A., Freed, P. W., Westcott, J. Y., & Henson, P. M. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci1112 · Cited by 3,166 · cited 2×
“Keywords: Oral tolerance, nasal tolerance, autoimmune diseases, bystander suppression”
BackgroundNatural autoantibodies: from ‘horror autotoxicus’ to ‘gnothi seauton’
Avrameas, S. (1991) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/s0167-5699(05)80045-3 · Cited by 766
Cited by
Tlaskalová-Hogenová, H., Štěpánková, R., Kozáková, H., Hudcovic, T., Vannucci, L., Tučková, L., Rossmann, P., Hrnčíř, T., Kverka, M., Zákostelská, Z., et al. (2011) · Cellular & Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/cmi.2010.67 · Cited by 693
From Sewer to Saviour—Targeting the Lymphatic System to Promote Drug Exposure and Activity
Trevaskis, N. L., Kaminskas, L. M., & Porter, C. J. H. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4608 · Cited by 654
Treatment of neuromyelitis optica: state-of-the-art and emerging therapies
Papadopoulos, M. C., Bennett, J. L., & Verkman, A. S. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.141 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Faria, A. M. C., & Weiner, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Immunology Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 143-157
- ISSN
- 2314-7156 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-8861
- OpenAlex
- W2095764253
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Tolerance: Therapeutic Implications for Autoimmune Diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17402520600876804
- The paper
- Faria, A. M. C., & Weiner, H. L. (2006). Oral Tolerance: Therapeutic Implications for Autoimmune Diseases. Journal of Immunology Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/17402520600876804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.