Cited by 32Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Lisdexamfetamine: chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability in the treatment of binge eating disorder

Ward, Kristen, Citrome, Leslie·2018·Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology

Abstract

Introduction The indications for lisdexamfetamine (LDX), a central nervous system stimulant, were recently expanded to include treatment of moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED). Areas covered: This review aims to describe the chemistry and pharmacology of LDX, as well as the clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of this medication for the management of BED. Expert opinion: LDX is the first medication with United States Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of BED. It is an inactive prodrug of d-amphetamine that extends the half-life of d-amphetamine to allow for once daily dosing. D-amphetamine acts primarily to increase the concentrations of synaptic dopamine and norepinephrine. Metabolism of LDX to d-amphetamine occurs when peptidases in red blood cells cleave the covalent bond between d-amphetamine and l-lysine. D-amphetamine is then further metabolized by CYP2D6. Excretion is primarily through renal mechanisms. In clinical trials, LDX demonstrated statistical and clinical superiority over placebo in reducing binge eating days per week at doses of 50 and 70 mg daily. Commonly reported side effects of LDX include dry mouth, insomnia, weight loss, and headache, and its use should be avoided in patients with known structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, serious heart arrhythmia or coronary artery disease. As with all CNS stimulants, risk of abuse needs to be assessed prior to prescribing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17425255.2018.1420163

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Ward, K., & Citrome, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • New York Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Citrome, Leslie
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
229-238
ISSN
  • 1742-5255 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7607
OpenAlex
W2777742400
Cited by
32
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine, binge eating disorder, d-amphetamine, prodrugs, psychostimulants, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug metabolism, CYP2D6, dopamine, norepinephrine, drug safety, abuse risk, FDA approval
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Drug Administration Schedule, Half-Life, Humans, Methyldopa, Norepinephrine, Prodrugs, Severity of Illness Index, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review