Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does nanoparticle activity depend upon size and crystal phase?

Open access
Jiang, Jingkun, Oberdörster, Günter, Elder, Alison, Gelein, Robert, Mercer, Pamela, Biswas, Pratim·2008·Nanotoxicology

Abstract

Jingkun Jianga, Günter Oberdörsterb, Alison Elderb, Robert Geleinb, Pamela Mercerb & Professor Pratim Biswas PhDaa Aerosol and Air Quality Research Laboratory, Department of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, , USAb Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, , USADepartment of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Campus Box 1180, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA, +1 314 935 5482, +1 314 935 5464 pratim.biswas@wustl.eduA method to investigate the dependence of the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles (e.g., size, surface area and crystal phase) on their oxidant generating capacity is proposed and demonstrated for TiO2 nanoparticles. Gas phase synthesis methods that allow for strict control of size and crystal phase were used to prepare TiO2 nanoparticles. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating capacity of these particles was then measured. The size dependent ROS activity was established using TiO2 nanoparticles of nine different sizes (4–195 nm) but the same crystal phase. For a fixed total surface area, an S-shaped curve for ROS generation per unit surface area was observed as a function of particle size. The highest ROS activity per unit area was observed for 30 nm particles, and observed to be constant above 30 nm. There was a decrease in activity per unit area as size decreased from 30–10 nm; and again constant for particles smaller than 10 nm. The correlation between crystal phase and oxidant capacity was established using TiO2 nanoparticles of 11 different crystal phase combinations but similar size. The ability of different crystal phases of TiO2 nanoparticles to generate ROS was highest for amorphous, followed by anatase, and then anatase/rutile mixtures, and lowest for rutile samples. Based on evaluation of the entire dataset, important dose metrics for ROS generation are established. The implications of these ROS studies on biological and toxicological studies using nanomaterials are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17435390701882478

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, J., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Gelein, R., Mercer, P., & Biswas, P.
Venue
Nanotoxicology
Published
2008-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
33-42
ISSN
  • 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-5404
OpenAlex
W2050081396
Cited by
439
References
3
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does nanoparticle activity depend upon size and crystal phase? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17435390701882478
The paper
Jiang, J., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Gelein, R., Mercer, P., & Biswas, P. (2008). Does nanoparticle activity depend upon size and crystal phase? Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390701882478

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.