Food safety knowledge and practices among food handlers and consumers in Gulf countries: An integrative review
Open accessAbstract
Foodborne illnesses result from inadequate food handling practices, but prevention is possible through implementing food safety principles by handlers and consumers. This paper presents an overview of food safety knowledge and practices among food handlers and consumers in the Gulf countries, identifies factors affecting knowledge and practice, and offers recommendations for promoting food safety among handlers and consumers. A literature search was conducted using an integrative review method. Various combinations of the following descriptors were used: (food safety, food hygiene), (knowledge, practice), and (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Oman, and Kuwait). Out of 164 studies screened, 37 met the eligibility criteria. Food handler studies reported insufficient food safety knowledge, with poor translation of existing knowledge into practice. Consumer studies showed varying levels of food safety knowledge, and the translation of existing knowledge into practice was also found to be inconsistent. Training and educational level were the primary factors positively affecting food safety knowledge and practices. Overall, significant gaps in knowledge and practices were identified among food handlers and consumers in the Gulf. These gaps require urgent attention from the Gulf regulatory bodies to develop targeted food safety training and education programs to enhance awareness and implementation of food safety principles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consumer knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) are central to achieving safe food handling and reducing foodborne diseases.
“Therefore, safe food handling and hygiene behaviours at the household level are essential in reducing foodborne diseases [32], with consumer knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) being central to achieving this goal [6,29,33,34].”
From Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of Urban Consumers in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries (LLMICs): A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Aljasir, S. F.
- Affiliations
- Qassim University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Aljasir, Sulaiman F.
- ORCID
- Aljasir, Sulaiman F.
- Venue
- Global Public Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-01-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2287584-2287584
- ISSN
- 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-1706
- OpenAlex
- W4389103306
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research
- Qassim
- University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- food safety knowledge, food safety practices, food handlers, food consumers, foodborne illness prevention, food hygiene, knowledge-practice gap, food safety training, food safety education, Gulf states
- MeSH terms
- Educational Status, Food Handling, Foodborne Diseases, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review