Cited by 24Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentMigration and Exile Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Escape to the island: International volunteer engagement on Lesvos during the refugee crisis

Guribye, Eugene, Mydland, Trond Stalsberg·2018·Journal of Civil Society

Abstract

As hundreds of thousands of refugees and migrants haphazardly crossed the strait between Turkey and the Greek island of Lesvos on their way to safety in Europe in 2015, thousands of citizens from all over Europe temporarily abandoned their day jobs to be of some sort of assistance for the refugees as they arrived on the beaches of Lesvos. We analyze the process and the relationships between the various stakeholders who were involved in the refugee crisis between April 2015 and January 2018, arguing that there is a need to find new ways of managing this type of spontaneous volunteerism without on the one hand strangling flexible and innovative volunteering initiatives, and on the other hand without compromising knowledge-based humanitarian responses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17448689.2018.1518774

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Chelladurai S., 2006, Private development initiatives: SBP projects of cordaid in India
  2. Cnaan R., 2005, Vrijwillige Inzet Onderzocht, 2, 29
  3. Collett E., 2016, The paradox of the EU-Turkey deal
  4. Cottrell A., 2010, A survey of spontaneous volunteers
  5. 10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00440.x · DOI
  6. LaCour A., 2014, Frivillighedens logik og dens politik
  7. Macduff N., 2005, Societal changes and rise of the episodic volunteer, emerging areas of volunteering
  8. McCurley S., 2005, Keeping volunteers: A guide to retention
  9. McGehee N. G., 2008, Journeys of discovery in volunteer tourism, 12
  10. Schulpen L., 2007, Development in the ‘Africa for beginners’. Dutch private development initiatives in Ghana and Malawi
  11. Tiessen R., 2012, Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education, 2, 1
  12. Vis F., 2015, The iconic image on social media: A rapid research response to the death of Aylan Kurdi
  13. Wilkinson B., 2014, International Journal of Communication and Health, 2, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Guribye, E., & Mydland, T. S.
Affiliations
Agder Research (NO)
Corresponding author
Guribye, Eugene
Venue
Journal of Civil Society
Published
2018-09-27
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
346-363
ISSN
  • 1744-8689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8697
OpenAlex
W2894048640
Cited by
24
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Civil Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
Keywords
international volunteers, refugee crisis, Lesbos, volunteer management, humanitarian response, stakeholder relations, 2015 refugee crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review