The new global governors: globalization, civil society, and the rise of private philanthropic foundations
Abstract
One of the important drivers of change within contemporary global civil society is the growing power and influence of private philanthropic foundations (PPFs). To illustrate this argument, this article considers the cases of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the Open Society Foundations (OSF), the largest and fourth largest PPFs in the world today by wealth or assets, and, especially, their founders. The article considers their influence within global civil society, within the context of international development, and the consequences of their activities for a range of international actors. This is done in the context of debate within the literature on the activities of PPFs, in which the articles sides with advocates of critical scrutiny. In developing its argument, the article draws on a range of sources including the financial statements and audited accounts of PPFs, of other non-governmental organizations and of selected inter-governmental organizations. It is argued that the BMGF and OSF are engines of neoliberalism and potent symbols of a second distinct ‘gilded age’ and that their influence must be restrained through anti-trust measures and through greater taxation and regulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CSOs represented in this study were typically dependent on international rather than national and short-term rather than long-term funding, which made building lasting capacity and effective coalitions difficult.
“In line with the literature on LMIC-based CSOs47–49 public health50–52 and tobacco control,53 54 the CSOs represented in this study were typically dependent on international (rather than national) and short-term (rather than long-term) funding, the latter in particular made building lasting capacity and effective coalitions difficult.”
From Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Matthes, B. K., Robertson, L., & Gilmore, A. B. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clarke, G.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Clarke, Gerard
- ORCID
- Clarke, Gerard
- Venue
- Journal of Civil Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-213
- ISSN
- 1744-8689 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8697
- OpenAlex
- W2945317783
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Civil Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
- Keywords
- global civil society, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations, philanthropy, globalization, neoliberalism, international development, foundation governance, Gilded Age
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review