Cited by 26Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringGlobalization and political ideologiesInternational Development and Aid

The new global governors: globalization, civil society, and the rise of private philanthropic foundations

Clarke, Gerard·2019·Journal of Civil Society

Abstract

One of the important drivers of change within contemporary global civil society is the growing power and influence of private philanthropic foundations (PPFs). To illustrate this argument, this article considers the cases of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the Open Society Foundations (OSF), the largest and fourth largest PPFs in the world today by wealth or assets, and, especially, their founders. The article considers their influence within global civil society, within the context of international development, and the consequences of their activities for a range of international actors. This is done in the context of debate within the literature on the activities of PPFs, in which the articles sides with advocates of critical scrutiny. In developing its argument, the article draws on a range of sources including the financial statements and audited accounts of PPFs, of other non-governmental organizations and of selected inter-governmental organizations. It is argued that the BMGF and OSF are engines of neoliberalism and potent symbols of a second distinct ‘gilded age’ and that their influence must be restrained through anti-trust measures and through greater taxation and regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17448689.2019.1622760

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CSOs represented in this study were typically dependent on international rather than national and short-term rather than long-term funding, which made building lasting capacity and effective coalitions difficult.

    “In line with the literature on LMIC-based CSOs47–49 public health50–52 and tobacco control,53 54 the CSOs represented in this study were typically dependent on international (rather than national) and short-term (rather than long-term) funding, the latter in particular made building lasting capacity and effective coalitions difficult.”

Authors
Clarke, G.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Gerard
Venue
Journal of Civil Society
Published
2019-07-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
197-213
ISSN
  • 1744-8689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8697
OpenAlex
W2945317783
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Civil Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
Keywords
global civil society, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations, philanthropy, globalization, neoliberalism, international development, foundation governance, Gilded Age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review