The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: A randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 12,000 hip and knee replacements were performed in Denmark in 2005. Accelerated perioperative interventions are currently implemented, but there is conflicting evidence regarding the effect. We therefore performed an efficacy study of an accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention in patients receiving primary total hip replacement, and both total and unicompartmental knee replacement. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken in which 87 patients were randomized to either a control group receiving the current perioperative procedure, or an intervention group receiving a new accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation procedure. Outcome measures were length of stay (LOS) in hospital, and gain in quality of life (QOL) using EQ-5D from baseline to 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mean LOS was reduced (p < 0.001) from 8 days (95% CI: 7.1-8.4) in the control group to 5 days (95% CI: 4.2-5.6) in the intervention group. This was accompanied by a greater gain in QOL of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.004-0.16) in the intervention group (p = 0.03). INTERPRETATION: An accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention in patients undergoing primary total hip replacement, and total or unicompartmental knee replacement is indeed effective-and of advantage to both the hospital and the patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Manca, A., Hawkins, N., & Sculpher, M. J. (2005) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.944 · Cited by 1,024
Brunenberg, D. E., van Steyn, M. J., Sluimer, J. C., Bekebrede, L. L., Bulstra, S. K., & Joore, M. A. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000178266.75744.35 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients
Nicholson, A., Lowe, M. C., Parker, J., Lewis, S. R., Alderson, P., & Smith, A. F. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9394 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen, K., Sørensen, O. G., Hansen, T. B., Thomsen, P. B., & Søballe, K.
- Venue
- Acta Orthopaedica
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-159
- ISSN
- 1745-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3682
- OpenAlex
- W1974766883
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: A randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17453670710014923
- The paper
- Larsen, K., Sørensen, O. G., Hansen, T. B., Thomsen, P. B., & Søballe, K. (2008). Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: A randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up. Acta Orthopaedica. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
