Cited by 105Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Knowledge graphs and their applications in drug discovery

MacLean, Finlay·2021·Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge graphs have proven to be promising systems of information storage and retrieval. Due to the recent explosion of heterogeneous multimodal data sources generated in the biomedical domain, and an industry shift toward a systems biology approach, knowledge graphs have emerged as attractive methods of data storage and hypothesis generation. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the author summarizes the applications of knowledge graphs in drug discovery. They evaluate their utility; differentiating between academic exercises in graph theory, and useful tools to derive novel insights, highlighting target identification and drug repurposing as two areas showing particular promise. They provide a case study on COVID-19, summarizing the research that used knowledge graphs to identify repurposable drug candidates. They describe the dangers of degree and literature bias, and discuss mitigation strategies. EXPERT OPINION: Whilst knowledge graphs and graph-based machine learning have certainly shown promise, they remain relatively immature technologies. Many popular link prediction algorithms fail to address strong biases in biomedical data, and only highlight biological associations, failing to model causal relationships in complex dynamic biological systems. These problems need to be addressed before knowledge graphs reach their true potential in drug discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17460441.2021.1910673

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Graph representation learning has been successful in characterizing drugs at the systems level without patient data to predict interactions with other drugs, protein targets, side effects, and diseases.

    “Graph representation learning has been successful in characterizing drugs at the systems level without patient data to make predictions about interactions with other drugs, protein targets, side effects, diseases [6, 38, 39, 40, 48, 165].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 105

Authors
MacLean, F.
Affiliations
BenevolentAI (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
MacLean, Finlay
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Published
2021-04-12
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1057-1069
ISSN
  • 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-045X
OpenAlex
W3156260318
Cited by
105
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
BenevolentAI
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
knowledge graphs, drug discovery, drug repurposing, target identification, COVID-19 pandemic, link prediction, graph-based machine learning, biomedical data, hypothesis generation, systems biology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Algorithms, Computer Graphics, Humans, Systems Biology, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review