Cited by 28Doping in SportsPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingPharmacological Effects and Assays

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High doses of the anabolic steroid metandienone found in dietary supplements

Geyer, Hans, Bredehöft, Michael, Mareck, Ute, Parr, Maria, Schänzer, Wilhelm·2003·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

Three nutritional supplements with “1‐T matrix” were purchased by telephone order. The supplier of these supplements is a company from the UK, and the manufacturer is from the U.S. Aliquots of 1 g each were analyzed with gas chromatography / mass spectrometry and high pressure liquid chromatography with UV detector. In all supplements analyzed were found the anabolic‐andro‐genic steroid metandienone. Metandienone, only available by prescription, was not declared on the labels. The concentrations of metandienone were 17.30 mg/g, 0.41 mg/g, and 0.96 mg/g for supplements 1, 2, and 3. In supplement 1, the concentrations of metandienone varied from capsule to capsule. Maximum concentrations of metandienone of 28.9 mg/g were detected. In addition to enormous health risks, the use of the analyzed supplements can lead to positive doping results for metandienone. The results of this study show that it is of major importance to improve the surveillance of the production and trade of dietary supplements. The first step should be a warning to be issued to consumers and the withdrawal of dietary supplements containing prescription drugs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461390300073102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gmeiner G., 2002, Methandienon in Sportnahrung, Österreichisches Journal für Sportmedizin, 2, 33
  2. Geyer H., 2000, Positive Dopingfälle mit Norandrosteron durch verunreinigte Nahrungsergänzungsmittel, Dtsch. Z. Sportmed, 11, 378
  3. Royal Pharmaceutical Society, 1996, Martindale—the extra pharmacopeia ‐31. Rev

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Geyer, H., Bredehöft, M., Mareck, U., Parr, M., & Schänzer, W.
Affiliations
German Sport University Cologne (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1391
OpenAlex
W2120565540
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
metandienone, anabolic steroids, dietary supplements, supplement contamination, doping, supplement labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review