Cited by 37Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Restricting short-wavelength light in the evening to improve sleep in recreational athletes—A pilot study

Open access
Knufinke, Melanie, Fittkau‐Koch, Lennart, Møst, Els I. S., Kompier, Michiel A. J., Nieuwenhuys, Arne·2019·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

Sleep is crucial for recovery and skill acquisition in athletes. Paradoxically, athletes often encounter difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep, while having sufficient sleep opportunity. Blue (short-wavelength) light as emitted by electronic screens is considered a potential sleep thief, as it suppresses habitual melatonin secretion. The current study sought to investigate whether blocking short-wavelength light in the evening can improve sleep onset latency and potentially other sleep parameters among recreational athletes. The study had a within-subject crossover design. Fifteen recreational athletes, aged between 18 and 32 years (12 females, 3 males), were randomly assigned to start the intervention period with either the light restriction condition (LR; amber-lens glasses), or the no-light restriction condition (nLR; transparent glasses). Sleep hygiene practices, actigraphy and diary-based sleep estimates were monitored during four consecutive nights within each condition. Sleep hygiene practices did not significantly differ between conditions. Results indicate that blocking short-wavelength light in the evening, as compared to habitual light exposure, significantly shortened subjective sleep onset latency (Δ = 7 min), improved sleep quality (Δ = 0.6; scale 1-10), and increased alertness the following morning. Actigraphy-based sleep estimates showed no significant differences between conditions. Blocking short-wavelength light in the evening by means of amber-lens glasses is a cost-efficient and promising means to improve subjective sleep estimates among recreational athletes in their habitual home environment. The relatively small effects of the current study may be strengthened by additionally increasing morning- and daytime light exposure and, potentially, by reducing the alerting effects of media use before bedtime.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461391.2018.1544278

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short-wavelength light on the preceding evening reduced next-morning alertness because its alerting effects in the evening may have interfered with the subsequent sleep.

    “Thus, short-wavelength light on the preceding evening reduced next-morning alertness because its alerting effects in the evening may have interfered with the subsequent sleep.”

    From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Sleep estimates section (page unavailable) reports greater next-morning alertness after evenings with short-wavelength light restriction than after evenings without it. The Introduction proposes that evening short-wavelength light may increase alertness and disrupt sleep, but the study found no significant difference in evening sleepiness between conditions and did not establish that evening alertness caused the morning difference. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous research showed opposite results regarding subjective sleepiness after printed material reading.

    “However, the finding that subjective sleepiness was higher during these first minutes after awakening when printed material was used for reading in the preceding evening was unexpected since previous research showed opposite results [9,11,42].”

    From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Sleep estimates section reports greater alertness upon awakening after evenings with amber-lens glasses than after evenings with transparent glasses, consistent with the opposite direction of the citing paper’s finding. But the study compared light-filtering glasses, not printed-material reading, so it does not establish the claimed result for reading. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our findings for objective alertness 30 min after awakening are in line with previous studies investigating subjective sleepiness.

    “Nevertheless, our findings for objective alertness 30 min after awakening are in line with these previous studies investigating subjective sleepiness.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 37

Authors
Knufinke, M., Fittkau‐Koch, L., Møst, E. I. S., Kompier, M. A. J., & Nieuwenhuys, A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Philips CTO, Research Eindhoven Netherlands
Corresponding author
Knufinke, Melanie
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-14
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
728-735
ISSN
  • 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1391
OpenAlex
W2901568345
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
STW Technology Foundation (STW 12865)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
short-wavelength light, blue light, light limitation, sleep latency, sleep quality, recreational athletes, melatonin suppression, sleep hygiene, actigraphy, alertness, evening light exposure, screen time before bedtime
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Eyeglasses, Female, Humans, Light, Male, Pilot Projects, Sleep, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult, Actigraphy, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review