Modulation of interpersonal trust in borderline personality disorder by intranasal oxytocin and childhood trauma
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by interpersonal difficulties, whereby patients are negatively biased concerning the evaluation of others' trustworthiness. Here, we examined the effect of oxytocin on interpersonal behavior of BPD patients in a trust game, emphasizing the assessment of facial attractiveness of the patients' counterparts in the game, and patients' history of childhood trauma. Thirteen BPD patients and thirteen healthy controls played a trust game after receiving oxytocin or placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Childhood trauma was evaluated using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Patients transferred less money in the oxytocin condition compared to placebo. While healthy controls transferred more money units (MUs) to attractive counterparts than to unattractive ones only after the administration of oxytocin, BPD patients showed this pattern in both conditions. Emotional neglect during childhood negatively correlated with the amount of MUs transferred by patients under oxytocin, but not placebo. Oxytocin had a trust-lowering effect in BPD, which was correlated with patients' history of childhood trauma. Patients' evaluation of interpersonal trust seems to depend more on attractiveness features of their counterparts than in controls, a finding that may have important implications for further research on the usefulness of "prosocial" peptides as an adjunct to psychotherapeutic interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oxytocin effects can vary as a function of social context history of childhood maltreatment.
“previous research has shown that oxytocin effects can vary as a function of emotion regulation skills (Quirin et al., 2011), social context history of childhood maltreatment (Ebert et al., 2013; Flanagan et al., 2015), and sex (Ditzen et al., 2012; Rilling et al., 2014).”
From Augmenting Prolonged Exposure therapy for PTSD with intranasal oxytocin: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Ebert et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Ebert, A., Kolb, M., Heller, J., Edel, M.-A., Roser, P., & Brüne, M.
- Affiliations
- LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Brüne, Martin
- Venue
- Social Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 305-313
- ISSN
- 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-0927
- OpenAlex
- W2060342476
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, interpersonal trust, oxytocin, childhood trauma, trust game, facial attractiveness, emotional neglect
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Beauty, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocics, Oxytocin, Cross-Over Studies, Trust, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review