The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of indoor location determination technologies
Abstract
The development of real-time locating systems (RTLS) has become an important add-on to many existing location aware systems. While GPS has solved most of the outdoor RTLS problems, it fails to repeat this success indoors. A number of technologies have been used to address the indoor tracking problem. The ability to accurately track the location of people indoors has many applications ranging from medical, military and logistical to entertainment. However, current systems cannot provide continuous real-time tracking of a moving target or lose capability when coverage is poor. The deployment of a real-time location determination system however is fraught with problems. To date there has been little research into comparing commercial systems on the market with regard to informing IT departments as to their performance in various aspects which are important to tracking devices and people in relatively confined areas. This article attempts to provide such a useful comparison by providing a review of the practicalities of installing certain location-sensing systems. We also comment on the accuracies achieved and problems encountered using the position-sensing systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system
Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2002) · Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2000.832252 · Cited by 8,380
Cited by
A survey of active and passive indoor localisation systems
Deak, G., Curran, K., & Condell, J. (2012) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2012.06.004 · Cited by 408
Self-citationLoveday, A., Sherar, L. B., Sanders, J. P., Sanderson, P. W., & Esliger, D. W. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4761 · Cited by 70
Kochańska, J., Burduk, A., Markowski, M., Kłusek, A., & Wojciechowska, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15021113 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, K., Furey, E., Lunney, T., Santos, J., Woods, D., & McCaughey, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Location Based Services
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-78
- ISSN
- 1748-9725 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-9733
- OpenAlex
- W2149438367
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of indoor location determination technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17489725.2011.562927
- The paper
- Curran, K., Furey, E., Lunney, T., Santos, J., Woods, D., & McCaughey, A. (2011). An evaluation of indoor location determination technologies. Journal of Location Based Services. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2011.562927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.