The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk-Management and the Fortified Aid Compound: Everyday Life in Post-Interventionary Society
Abstract
The politicisation of aid has made helping others increasingly dangerous. The fortified aid compound is now ubiquitous throughout the global borderland. It has become the signature architecture, for example, of the UN integrated mission. In examining these developments, the article first looks at the potential for UN field-security training to normalise risk-aversion and the necessity, even desirability, of defensive living. Using the example of Sudan, the wider implications of aid bunkering, including its overlaps with such global trends as urban splintering and the proliferation of gated-communities are also examined. The fortified aid compound is symptomatic of the deepening crisis within the development-security nexus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-4413 · Cited by 7,988
RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES
Folke, C. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 · Cited by 7,749
Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5764 · Cited by 5,461
Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World.
Greenhalgh, S., & Escobar, A. (1995) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137509 · Cited by 5,455
The anti-politics machine: "development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2279 · Cited by 3,594
Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203452202 · Cited by 2,585
DAVIS, M. (2006) · New Perspectives Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5842.2006.00797.x · Cited by 2,106
Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts
Bauman, Z. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,057
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life
Nikolopoulou, K., Agamben, G., & Heller-Roazen, D. (2000) · SubStance · doi:10.2307/3685567 · Cited by 1,914
Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought
Mehta, U. S. (1999) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226519180.001.0001 · Cited by 1,526
Cited by
Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace
Sabaratnam, M. (2013) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010613485870 · Cited by 391
Hilhorst, D. (2018) · Journal of International Humanitarian Action · doi:10.1186/s41018-018-0043-6 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffield, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-474
- ISSN
- 1750-2977 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-2985
- OpenAlex
- W1997156904
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 27.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk-Management and the Fortified Aid Compound: Everyday Life in Post-Interventionary Society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17502971003700993
- The paper
- Duffield, M. (2010). Risk-Management and the Fortified Aid Compound: Everyday Life in Post-Interventionary Society. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502971003700993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.