The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education
Abstract
This paper analyses the role of rankings as an instrument of new managerialism. It shows how rankings are reconstituting the purpose of universities, the role of academics and the definition of what it is to be a student. The paper opens by examining the forces that have facilitated the emergence of the ranking industry and the ideologies underpinning the so-called ‘global’ university rankings. It demonstrates how rankings are a part of politically inspired, performativity-led mode of governance, designed to ensure that universities are aligned with market values through systems of intensive auditing. It interrogates how the seemingly objective character of rankings, in particular the use of numbers, creates a facade of certainty that make them relatively unassailable: numerical ordering gives the impression that what is of value in education can be measured numerically, hierarchically ordered and incontrovertibly judged. The simplicity and accessibility of numerical rankings deflects attention from their arbitrariness and their political and moral objectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Harvey, D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 · Cited by 16,394
The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge
Lyotard, J.-F., Bennington, G., & Massumi, B. (1984) · Poetics Today · doi:10.2307/1772278 · Cited by 14,728
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,192
A Brief History of Neoliberalism
(2020) · The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles · doi:10.2307/j.ctv17ppcd0.8 · Cited by 9,074
The End of History and the Last Man
Fukuyama, F. (1992) · Cited by 7,535
The End of History and the Last Man.
Fritzsche, P., & Fukuyama, F. (1992) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2164782 · Cited by 6,496
Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought
Rose, N. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488856 · Cited by 6,346
Powers of freedom: reframing political thought
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3035 · Cited by 5,663
The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity
Ball, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065 · Cited by 4,829
The Audit Society: Rituals of VerificationPreprint
Power, M. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3,596
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, K.
- Venue
- Critical Studies in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-207
- ISSN
- 0076-6275 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8487
- 1750-8495
- OpenAlex
- W2026346291
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 80.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17508487.2014.949811
- The paper
- Lynch, K. (2015). Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.949811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.