The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-period configurational patterns for emotion polarization regulation during major catastrophic emergencies
Abstract
Major catastrophic emergencies often give rise to a polarization of negative public sentiment within public opinion. Without proper regulation, such polarization can instigate public fear, anger, or even erode government credibility. This paper constructs configurational patterns for official media’s emotion polarization regulation during major emergencies from a causal configuration perspective. Multi-stage nature of major emergencies and the multiple types of public opinion information are considered. Using the China Eastern Airlines MU5735 crash as a study case, trending data throughout the entire cycle of this emergency from Sina Weibo was collected via web crawlers and categorized through topic clustering. This paper defined positive sentiment entropy and constructed sentiment dictionary based on this case. Based on the Yale attitude change model, fifteen potential conditions were specified. To mitigate data redundancy, ensemble models were used to identify key conditions. Multi-period fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (mfsQCA) was then used to identify configurational patterns for moderating collective emotion polarization and deriving decision-oriented implications. This paper offers a configurational perspective on regulating emotion polarization in online public opinion. It also contributes to crisis communication and disaster management by offering methodological insights for moderating public sentiment during emergencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects
Gross, J. J. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.940781 · Cited by 5,229
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320040111 · Cited by 3,687
Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009) · SAGE Publications · doi:10.4135/9781452226569 · Cited by 3,089
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310 · Cited by 2,254
Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602 · Cited by 1,797
Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290408 · Cited by 1,604
Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. L. T., & Ed, H. (2010) · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2010.33 · Cited by 1,183
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? An Empirical Study of Image Content and Social Media Engagement
Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243719881113 · Cited by 1,022
Sun, Z., Wang, G., Li, P., Wang, H., Min, Z., & Liang, X. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121549 · Cited by 633
Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA
Dul, J. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.134 · Cited by 611
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Berg-Schlosser, D., & Meur, G. (2009). Comparative research design: Case and variable selection. In ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264120273_Comparative_Research_Design_Case_and_Variable_Selection
- Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
- Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/hash/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Abstract.html
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Y., Zuo, Y., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-01-31
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 276-289
- ISSN
- 1750-9653
- 1750-9661
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 75
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China ([Grant No. 72174134])
- Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China ([Grant No. 22&ZD142])
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-period configurational patterns for emotion polarization regulation during major catastrophic emergencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17509653.2026.2616016
- The paper
- Zhou, Y., Zuo, Y., & Yang, Y. (2026). Multi-period configurational patterns for emotion polarization regulation during major catastrophic emergencies. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2026.2616016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.