20 years later: deliberate practice and the development of expertise in sport
Abstract
Twenty-one years ago, Ericsson, Krampe and Tesch-Romer published their seminal work expounding the notion of deliberate practice in explaining the development of expertise. This concept has since become extremely influential in the fields of sport psychology and motor learning. This review evaluates current understanding of deliberate practice in sport skill acquisition with an emphasis on the role of deliberate practice in distinguishing expert athletes from non-experts. In particular, we re-examine the original tenets of Ericsson et al.'s framework to (a) evaluate the sport-related research supporting their claims and (b) identify remaining research questions in this area. The review highlights the overall importance of deliberate practice in the development of expert sport performers; however, our understanding is far from complete. Several directions for future research are highlighted, including the need for more rigorous research designs and statistical models that can evaluate changes in developmental and contextual factors across development. Finally, we advocate for a more thorough understanding of the implications of a ‘deliberate practice approach’ for coaching science.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
International-level performers often accumulated 3,000-40,000 h of domain-specific activities before reaching highest performance.
“performers competing at the international level-have often accumulated between 3,000 and 40,000 h of engagement in domain-specific activities before they reach their highest level of performance (Baker and Young, 2014).”
From Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research (2019) · cites this paper as Baker and Young, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 223
- Authors
- Baker, J., & Young, B.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Joseph
- Venue
- International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-157
- ISSN
- 1750-984X (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9858
- OpenAlex
- W2127754891
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 29.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- deliberate practice, expertise development, sport skill acquisition, expert athletes, motor learning, sport psychology, coaching science, developmental factors, contextual factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review