The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Scoping reviews and rapid reviews
Open accessAbstract
Scoping reviews and rapid reviews are intentional approaches to systematically synthesize research. In sport and exercise psychology, scoping reviews can summarize information to describe what is known on a relevant topic. Rapid reviews offer accelerated knowledge synthesis through a streamlined timely and cost-effective approach that is directed and guided by stakeholders. Both scoping and rapid reviews are used to synthesize the literature, and also to describe and assess conceptual, theoretical, and methodological trends, identify gaps in research and practice, and inform future sport and exercise psychology research and practice directions. We offer evidence-based and field-specific guidelines to conduct scoping reviews and rapid reviews. These types of syntheses in sport and exercise psychology are important for advancing research and practice and highlight the value of collaborations with key stakeholders. Our guidelines will help with the uniformity and dependability of scoping and rapid reviews while also advancing the impact and value of this type of research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence-based and field-specific scoping review guidelines proposed by Sabiston et al. were considered, including registration of a study protocol and performance of a quality appraisal.
“Evidence-based and field-specific scoping review guidelines proposed by Sabiston et al. [49] were also considered, including the registration of a study protocol and the performance of a quality appraisal.”
From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
The MMAT helps to broadly assess the coherence and methodological robustness of the included studies.
“Although the MMAT helps to broadly assess the coherence and methodological robustness of the included studies [49]”
From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Scoping reviews are considered to be descriptive and thematic in nature.
“Furthermore, given scoping reviews are considered to be descriptive and thematic in nature [49]”
From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Allen M. S., 2020, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1
- Budzynski-Seymour E., 2020, SportRχiv
- Copeland, R., Myers, A. & Nichols, S. (2018).Rapid review of physical activity measurement and surveillance tools and toolkits. http://www.hepness.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Armagh-Rapid-Review.pdf
- Dobbins M., 2017, Rapid review guidebook steps for conducting a rapid review
- Gardam K., 2017, Journal of Sport for Development, 5, 30
- Hartling L., 2015, Research White Paper. (Prepared by the Scientific Resource Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00004-C.) AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC008-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Mays N., 2001, Studying the organization and delivery of health services: Research methods, 188
- Moja H. J., 2015, Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic. Systematic Reviews 4, 4.
- Tricco A. C., 2017, Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide
- Vani M. F., 2021, Psycho-Oncology, 1
- Veritas Health Innovation. (2015).Covidence systematic review software. https://www.covidence.org
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabiston, C. M., Vani, M., de Jonge, M., & Nesbitt, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Sabiston, Catherine M.
- Venue
- International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-01-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-119
- ISSN
- 1750-984X (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9858
- OpenAlex
- W4206825244
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs program
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Ontario Graduate Scholarships
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- scoping review, rapid review, sport and exercise psychology, stakeholder engagement, research gaps, methodological trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
