Agenda Building In Media Coverage of Food Research: Superfoods coverage in UK national newspapers
Open accessAbstract
Concern has been raised about the rising influence of public relations on scientific news coverage and the potential role of institutional sources in shaping news reports. This study uses quantitative content analysis and qualitative interviews to explore the influence of public relations activities on newspaper coverage of “superfoods” and, in particular, to explore the transparency of reporting of the sources of research funding. Superfoods were chosen as a case study because the term is applied to a wide range of foods with potential health benefits (e.g. foods high in antioxidants). Furthermore, foods labelled as “superfoods” have seen sharp increases in sales, suggesting a potential commercial incentive for such labelling. Analysis of a sample of news articles reporting superfoods revealed a considerable influence for media releases in shaping the content of reports, while less than a third of reports discussing research studies funded by organisations with a commercial interest in the findings mentioned the funding sources. Qualitative interviews confirmed the role of press offices in promoting research, particularly from scientific conferences, and suggest that scientific societies are applying less stringent criteria to studies selected for publication than in the past.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exaggerations and Caveats in Press Releases and Health-Related Science News
Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Bott, L., Adams, R., Venetis, C. A., Whelan, L., Hughes, B., & Chambers, C. D. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168217 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Dempster, G., Sutherland, G., & Keogh, L. (2022) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.21010206 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Vijaykumar, S., McNeill, A., & Simpson, J. (2021) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980021000124 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weitkamp, E., & Eidsvaag, T.
- Corresponding author
- Weitkamp, Emma
- Eidsvaag, Torill
- ORCID
- Weitkamp, Emma
- Venue
- Journalism Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 871-886
- ISSN
- 1751-2786 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-2794
- OpenAlex
- W1487509499
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journalism Practice (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- agenda building, superfoods, public relations, press releases, research funding disclosure, source transparency, press office, scientific societies, publication criteria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review