Cited by 12Cultural Identity and RepresentationCinema and Media StudiesIndigenous Studies in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Into the unknown [Amas Mu Vuordá]? Listening to Indigenous voices on the meanings of Disney’s Frozen 2 [Jikŋon 2]

Open access
Kvidal-Røvik, Trine, Cordes, Ashley·2022·Journal of International and Intercultural Communication

Abstract

In 2019, Disney released the animated film Frozen 2 and included depictions of Indigenous Sámi peoples, landscapes, and lifeways. Communication scholars have critiqued relationships between Disney and Indigenous cultures. However, with Frozen 2 Sámi consultants initiated a new mode of collaboration with Disney to combat cultural appropriation, linguistic erasure, and misrepresentations. This resulted in almost unanimously positive media praise by Sámi individuals and communities in Scandinavia. By drawing upon an Indigenous listening methodology, we articulate ways Sámi communities discuss the degree to which Disney’s Frozen 2/Jikŋon 2 is a transformative agent (or not) in treatment of Indigenous communities in film.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17513057.2020.1849774

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Benediktsson, K. (2008). Moving places: The emotional politics of nature. In J. O. Bærenholdt & B. Granås (Eds.), Mobility and place: Enacting Northern European periperies (pp. 205–218). Ashgate.
  2. Onsøien, O. G. (2020, January 8). Disney ga oss den ikke [Disney did not give it to us]. Finnmark Dagblad, 24–25.
  3. Ramnarine, T. K. (2015). Frozen through Nordic frames. Puls: Swedish Journal of Ethnomusicology and Ethnochoreology, 1, 13–31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Kvidal-Røvik, T., & Cordes, A.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Kvidal-Røvik, Trine
Venue
Journal of International and Intercultural Communication
Published
2020-12-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
17-35
ISSN
  • 1751-3057 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-3065
OpenAlex
W3109863050
Cited by
12
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of International and Intercultural Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
Keywords
Frozen 2, Sami people, Indigenous representation in film, Disney, indigenous consultation, cultural appropriation, animated film, Sami communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review