The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloud manufacturing: from concept to practice
Abstract
The concept of cloud manufacturing is emerging as a new promising manufacturing paradigm, as well as a business model, which is reshaping the service-oriented, highly collaborative, knowledge-intensive and eco-efficient manufacturing industry. However, the basic concepts about cloud manufacturing are still in discussion. Both academia and industry will need to have a commonly accepted definition of cloud manufacturing, as well as further guidance and recommendations on how to develop and implement cloud manufacturing. In this paper, we review some of the research work and clarify some fundamental terminologies in this field. Further, we developed a cloud manufacturing systems which may serve as an application example. From a systematic and practical perspective, the key requirements of cloud manufacturing platforms are investigated, and then we propose a cloud manufacturing platform prototype, MfgCloud. Finally, a public cloud manufacturing system for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME) is presented. This paper presents a new perspective for cloud manufacturing, as well as a cloud-to-ground solution. The integrated solution proposed in this paper, including the terminology, MfgCloud, and applications, can push forward this new paradigm from concept to practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0
Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 · Cited by 1,262
The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0
Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647 · Cited by 1,188
A Novel Cloud-Based Framework for the Elderly Healthcare Services Using Digital Twin
Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Yang, Y., Zhou, L., Ren, L., Wang, F., Liu, R., Pang, Z., & Deen, M. J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909828 · Cited by 763
Self-citationIoT-Based Intelligent Perception and Access of Manufacturing Resource Toward Cloud Manufacturing
Tao, F., Zuo, Y., Xu, L. D., & Zhang, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2306397 · Cited by 587
Self-citationDetecting cyber-physical attacks in CyberManufacturing systems with machine learning methods
Wu, M., Song, Z., & Moon, Y. B. (2019) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-017-1315-5 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, L., Zhang, L., Tao, F., Zhao, C., Chai, X., & Zhao, X.
- Venue
- Enterprise Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-209
- ISSN
- 1751-7575 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7583
- OpenAlex
- W2026708242
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloud manufacturing: from concept to practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17517575.2013.839055
- The paper
- Ren, L., Zhang, L., Tao, F., Zhao, C., Chai, X., & Zhao, X. (2015). Cloud manufacturing: from concept to practice. Enterprise Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2013.839055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.