A survey of phishing attack techniques, defence mechanisms and open research challenges
Abstract
Phishing is an identity theft, which deceives Internet users into revealing their sensitive data, e.g., login information, credit/debit card details, and so on. Researchers have developed various anti-phishing methods in recent years. However, the problem still exists. Therefore, this paper presents a detailed analysis of phishing attack methods and defense techniques. This survey is presented in five folds. First, we discuss in detail the lifecycle of phishing attack, its history, and motivation behind this attack. Second, we present various distribution methods that are used to spread phishing attacks. Third, we provide taxonomy of various phishing-attacking techniques in desktop and mobile environments. Fourth, we provide numerous phishing protection mechanisms and their comparisons. Finally, the article presents various performance challenges faced by developers while dealing with this crucial attack. This paper also provides the consequences of phishing attacks in emerging domains like mobile and online social networks. This paper will help the different users in avoiding phishing attacks while using Internet for their day-to-day activities, and will guide business administrators in designing new effective solutions for their enterprise against various types of phishing threats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misconfigured cloud-level load balancing can be exploited to cause a DDoS attack that renders web server resources inaccessible.
“Additionally, the attacker may exploit misconfigured cloud-level load balancing, causing a DDoS attack [105] that renders Prime MotorX resources on the web server inaccessible, disrupting production and customer experience.”
From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [105]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 192
- Authors
- Jain, A. K., & Gupta, B. B.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Gupta, B.B.
- Venue
- Enterprise Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 527-565
- ISSN
- 1751-7575 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7583
- OpenAlex
- W3138009395
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 28.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Enterprise Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Keywords
- phishing, social networking sites, identity theft, sensitive information disclosure, enterprise security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review