The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 73 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Anti-cancer green bionanomaterials: present status and future prospects
Open accessAbstract
Cancer is one of the most common health problems responsible for outnumbered deaths worldwide. Nanomedicine plays an important role in developing alternative and more effective treatment strategies for cancer theranostics. However, the toxicity, high cost and nanoparticles (NPs) production complexity are some of the major issues that obstruct the use of existing nanomedicine. Recently, the green synthesis of biogenic NPs from plants and microbial sources has become an emerging field due to their safer, eco-friendly, simple, fast, energy efficient, low-cost and less toxic nature. Interestingly, NPs play a key role in diagnosis of tumor at the initial stage by allowing cellular visualization. Furthermore, prospective applications of green NPs include magnetically responsive drug delivery, anti-cancer activity, photo-thermal therapy and bio-imaging. The present review provides perspective on the use of anti-cancer green bionanomaterials with a focus on their present status and future prospects in the theranostics of cancer.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This narrative review argues that green-synthesized metal bionanomaterials from plants and microbes are promising, safer, lower-cost alternatives for cancer theranostics, with reported in vitro anticancer activity and imaging/drug-delivery applications. However, clinical translation remains limited by incomplete mechanistic understanding, toxicity/immunological concerns, protein corona effects, and manufacturing/scale-up challenges.
Key findings
- Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles (Au, Ag, Cu, Ti, Zn, Fe) is reported from plant extracts, algae, bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi, and yeast; phytochemicals such as flavonoids, polyphenols, proteins, and alkaloids are proposed to reduce and cap metal ions, while microbial nitrate reductase is implicated in extracellular fabrication.
- In vitro anticancer activity is reported against many cancer cell lines, often dose-dependent, with some selectivity examples: biogenic AgNPs showed IC50 27.75 µg/mL against SMMC-7721 hepatoma vs 81.39 µg/mL in normal HL-7702 liver cells; AuNPs inhibited HeLa with IC50 100 µg/mL vs 300 µg/mL in normal bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; EPS-stabilized FeONPs had IC50 62.946 mg/mL vs 350.18 mg/mL for free EPS in A431 cells; *Erythrina suberosa* AgNPs had IC50 74.02 µg/mL vs 106.15 µg/mL for leaf extract and 136.73 µg/mL for AgNO3 in A-431 cells.
- Proposed anticancer mechanisms include reactive oxygen species generation, sub-G1 arrest, up-regulation of p53 and caspase-3, inhibition of VEGF-induced activities, glutathione loss, DNA-dependent protein kinase downregulation, and Bax up-regulation with Bcl-2 downregulation.
- Theranostic applications include fluorescent Au/Ce nanoclusters for bio-imaging in HeLa/HepG2 cells and tumor mice, biogenic AgNPs internalized by A549 and B16F10 cells, magnetically targeted drug delivery, and doxorubicin-loaded AuNPs@HMBPs for HeLa cells.
Methods
- Narrative review, not a primary experimental study; it synthesizes literature on green synthesis of metal bionanomaterials from plants and microbes and their anticancer/theranostic applications.
- Includes tables of phyto-sources and microbial sources for bionanoparticle synthesis and anticancer activity in various cell lines over the past 5 years, plus discussion of mechanisms, cancer diagnosis, drug delivery, and translational hurdles.
- No systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or quantitative meta-analysis is reported in the text.
Limitations
- The paper states that the exact mechanisms of metal nanoparticle biosynthesis and anticancer activity are not fully understood; residual biomolecules may remain on nanoparticle surfaces; some microbial sources include pathogenic microbes; the protein corona can compromise in vivo reliability; nanotechnology products are expensive due to manufacturing and preservation difficulties; scale-up reproducibility is challenging; and safety data are insufficient, requiring acute/chronic toxicity, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immune-response studies before clinical trials.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not provide a systematic search or quality appraisal, and many findings are cited from other studies rather than independently verified here.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
57 Sources not found · 14 Own interpretation · 3 No basis given
In the paper
“This study depicted that spherical-shaped AuNPs had a higher cellular uptake in comparison to rod-shaped AuNPs because of variable biophysical properties such receptor diffusion kinetics.”
§ 3. Hurdles for green nanomaterials as future cancer nanomedicine > 3.1. Diffusion and penetration
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation139
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Notably, NPs can play a vital role in cancer diagnosis at an early stage by allowing visualization of cancer cells.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation118
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Besides, increased oxidative stress leads to oxidation of glutathione (GSH) to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) through the oxidation process.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation24
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Seo et al. (Citation124). have reported a novel study of biosynthesizing AuNPs via employing heavy metal binding proteins (HMBPs) of genetically engineered Escherichia coli acting as reducing, stabilizing and capping agent.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation124
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Moreover, biocompatibility testing of metal NPs has been done on different normal cell lines such as HaCaT (human keratinocyte) (Citation76, Citation77), HMEC (human mammary epithelial cell) (Citation33), HDFa (human normal skin dermal fibroblast) (Citation39),”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation76
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation77
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation33
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, based on the aforementioned, the use of nanotechnology will be the best strategy for cancer diagnosis due to their self-fluorescence ability.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
boosteddirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“More interestingly, microalgae were designed for ecofriendly, scalable and permanent photobioreactors for sustainable and continuous fabrication of valuable bionanomaterials (Citation15).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although these studies depicted biocompatibility of metal NPs, some studies are not in agreement.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Besides, one of the major problems in the cancer treatment process is the side-effects owing to conventional treatment strategies (Citation8–10).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation8–10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All the mentioned mechanisms lead to extracellular or intracellular fabrication of metal NPs.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
In the paper
“Salunke et al. (Citation28) suggested the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall components, some proteins and alcoholic compounds in the synthesis and stabilization of MnO2 NPs (Citation28).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent nano-medical developments helped the progress of NPs for diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostics) applications.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although fabrication of NPs has attracted great interest for various physical and chemical processes, but there is an urgent need to explore alternative routes owing to some unsatisfying conditions of these methods such as the need for high temperature in the thermo-reductive process or intensive energy in the laser ablation process (Citation15).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, the group loaded doxorubicin (Dox) on the AuNPs@HMBPs DDS for treating the cancerous HeLa cells.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation124
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, the exact mechanism of metal NPs’ anti-cancer activity is not fully understood yet.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Importantly, the ROS leads to activation of caspase-3 which is responsible for cell apoptosis by arresting the cell cycle at the G2/M phase (Citation111).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation111
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In addition, the bioreduction process may be catalyzed by enzymes inside the cells or on the cell surface.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The untreated cells used as control and those treated with chemically fabricated AgNPs did not exhibit fluorescence, while those cancerous cells that were treated with biological synthesized AgNPs exhibited very strong fluorescence indicating the internalization of AgNPs by A549 & B16F10 cells (Citation120).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation120
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Indeed, by applying this strategy the associated side-effects along with the amount of the drug delivered are reduced, ultimately leading to reduced systemic toxicity (Citation122 , Citation123).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation122
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation123
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, Mukherjee et al. (Citation120) reported green synthesis of monodispersed AgNPs (20–60 nm) by using Olax scandens leaf extract, with spherical shape and high stability for several days.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation120
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recently, the applications of nanobiotechnology have revealed novel strategies for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, natural products and resources may ultimately prove to be more efficient and cost-effective.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Moreover, the fabrication of NPs by a chemical process may require toxic substrates, generates harmful wastes or requires large amounts of energy and even has low productivity (Citation16).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation16
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, prospective applications of green NPs include magnetically responsive drug delivery, anti-cancer activity, photo-thermal therapy and bio-imaging.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation12–14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Recently, the green synthesis of biogenic NPs from plants and microbial sources has become an emerging field due to their safer, eco-friendly, simple, fast, energy efficient, low-cost and less toxic nature.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In this regard, these instruments differ based on their underlying physical principles, sensitivity and specificity to contrast agents, tissue contrast, spatial resolution, quantitativeness and tissue penetration (Citation116).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation116
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“However, it is believed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, Sub-G1 arrest in cell, up-regulation of p53 protein and caspase-3 expression, inhibition of VEGF-induced activities are the major proposed anti-cancer mechanisms (Citation21, Citation110).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation110
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to the literature, several studies reported nontoxicity and biocompatibility of some metal NPs in normal cell lines, but high toxicity in cancer cell lines.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Notably, GSH is known as an antioxidant that prevents cells from ROS damages, consequently resulting in remarkably much MNPs’ cytotoxicity and loss of GSH (Citation24).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation24
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“One of the major drawbacks of current cancer treatment strategies is the lack of targeted drug delivery, resulting in systemic toxicity (Citation8 , Citation121).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation121
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Remarkably, alpha fetal protein (AFP) is a cancer biomarker in clinical diagnosis associated with the disease progression and therapeutic responses of liver cancer.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation117
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Green bionanomaterials involving metals such as gold, silver, copper, titanium, zinc and iron prepared from different bio-sources, and have been reported for various biomedical applications (Citation11).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In addition, metal NPs are used in drug delivery, gene delivery, medicine, cell labeling, sensors, food packaging, wound dressings, etc.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation12–14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The synthesized NPs were spherical in nature having a size of 5–20 nm in diameter.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation124
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This is in agreement with the study of Wang et al., 2013, which demonstrated green synthesis of silver NCs employing glutathione and showed in vivo fluorescent tumor imaging through living animal tumors (Citation119).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation119
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eventually, based on heterogeneity of bio-sources, various factors such as temperature, synthesis conditions, reaction time, substrate concentrations and pH can have significant impacts on the rate of synthesis reaction.”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Furthermore, according to the acceptable in vitro results, Au/Ce NCs were also investigated for in vivo bio-imaging in a tumor mice model of cervical carcinoma. As shown in , fluorescence was observed around the tumor after 24 h of subcutaneous Au/Ce NCs injection (Citation118).”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation118
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Specifically, it is also reported that the cellular uptake and penetration are independent of surface coating, size, density, initial dose concentration and morphology of NPs (Citation136).”
§ 3. Hurdles for green nanomaterials as future cancer nanomedicine > 3.1. Diffusion and penetration
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation136
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Notably, the exact mechanism of biosynthesis of metal NPs is not well understood yet (Citation25).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Polymeric NPs are naturally biodegradable and are cleared form the body. However, in case of metallic NPs biodegradability is slow and poses serious challenges in terms of toxicity (Citation50 , Citation147, Citation151).”
§ 3. Hurdles for green nanomaterials as future cancer nanomedicine > 3.3. Biodegradability, metabolic kinetics and clearance
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation50
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation147
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Citation151
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In this study, no differences were revealed in the cellular penetration of lactose- and glucose-modified AgNPs in L929, though there was a substantial growth in the cellular internalization of lactose-modified AgNPs into the A549, could be explained by the role of the chemical nature of the ligand in cellular uptake.”
§ 3. Hurdles for green nanomaterials as future cancer nanomedicine > 3.1. Diffusion and penetration
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation141
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering the above discussion, it is expected that green nanomaterials could emerge as future cancer therapeutics and diagnostics agents in the near future.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“More interestingly, it was suggested that the surface coating of NPs impact on rate of uptake (Citation140).”
§ 3. Hurdles for green nanomaterials as future cancer nanomedicine > 3.1. Diffusion and penetration
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation140
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Green nanomaterials are currently in a highly investigative phase for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer but the ultimate dependability is yet to be decided in clinical trials.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In another study reported by Rengan and coworkers, liposomal AuNPs were demonstrated for their biodegradability and as a potential DDS for cancer therapy. Moreover, metabolic degradation of the delivery system was noticed in liver and hepatocytes followed by its easy excretion via the renal route (Citation147).”
§ 3. Hurdles for green nanomaterials as future cancer nanomedicine > 3.3. Biodegradability, metabolic kinetics and clearance
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Citation147
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
Magnetically targeted NPs have overcome the disadvantage of non-specificity as carriers for FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs.
“Recently, magnetically targeted NPs have overcome this significant disadvantage of non-specificity as carriers for FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Residuals from phytosynthesis (amino acids, polysaccharides, flavonoids, alkaloids, vitamins, etc.) stick to the NPs’ surface and play a role in NPs’ function even after washing and purification.
“If we talk about phytosynthesis, many amino acids, polysaccharides, flavonoids, alkaloids, vitamins, etc. exist in the metal NPs’ medium method, which play a role in NPs’ function, even if their surfaces are washed and purified since the residuals would stick to the NPs’ surface.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Using pathogenic microbes such as E. coli as a bio-source for preparation of metal NPs causes hazards.
“Likewise, in microbial synthesis, there are a number of microorganisms involving saprophytes and even pathogenic microbes such as E. coli introduced as a bio-source for preparation of metal NPs which would cause some hazards according to clinical studies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nanotechnology-based products are highly expensive due to difficulties in manufacturing and preserving.
“Overall, nanotechnology-based products are highly expensive probably due to difficulties in the manufacturing and preserving process; thereby its progress would cost a high amount of money.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lab-produced NPs using routine top-down or bottom-up approaches vary greatly from those obtained from commercial producers.
“NPs produced using routine top-down or bottom-up approaches in the lab vary greatly from those obtained from commercial producers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A slight change in the optimized conditions of NPs’ synthesis can render the NPs biologically inactive, less stable, and highly impure.
“Practically, a slight change in the optimized conditions of NPs’ synthesis can render the NPs biologically inactive, less stable and highly impure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Diffusive resistance of various tissues (intestine, vagina, nose mucosal membranes, and lungs) poses a major barrier in nanomedicine delivery.
“In general, diffusive resistance of various tissues (intestine, vagina, nose mucosal membranes and lungs) poses a major barrier in nanomedicine delivery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sedimentation and diffusion velocities of NPs highly affect their penetration and cellular uptake.
“Researchers have scientifically proved that the sedimentation and diffusion velocities of NPs highly affect their penetration and cellular uptake.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Positively charged AuNPs may encounter a negative charge repulsion from the glomerular basement membrane in nephrons and pass out via urine.
“Furthermore, the studies shed light on the positively charged AuNPs, which may encounter a negative charge repulsion from the glomerular basement membrane in nephrons and pass out via urine.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.2. Biocompatible nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis
“This is in agreement with the study of Wang et al., 2013, which demonstrated green synthesis of silver NCs employing glutathione and showed in vivo fluorescent tumor imaging through living animal tumors (Citation119).”
§ References
“Gao, S.; Chen, D.; Li, Q.; Ye, J.; Jiang, H.; Amatore, C.; Wang, X. Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Cancer Cells and Tumors Through Specific Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoclusters. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4 (12), 1–6.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
“A431 (human vulvar squamous cell carcinoma) (Citation62)”
§ 2. Green bionanomaterials: an insight > 2.1. Anti-cancer activity of green nanomaterials: A mechanistic approach
“the A-431 osteosarcoma cell line”
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20107 · Cited by 55,077
Determining the Size and Shape Dependence of Gold Nanoparticle Uptake into Mammalian Cells
Chithrani, D. B., Ghazani, A. A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl052396o · Cited by 4,944
Biological Synthesis of Nanoparticles from Plants and Microorganisms
Singh, P., Kim, Y., Zhang, D., & Yang, D. (2016) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.006 · Cited by 1,924
Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications
Park, J., Gu, L., von Maltzahn, G., Ruoslahti, E. I., Bhatia, S. N., & Sailor, M. J. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2398 · Cited by 1,917
Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics
Desai, N. (2012) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9339-4 · Cited by 1,173
Gao, H., Yang, Z. H., Zhang, S., Cao, S., Shen, S.-Q., Pang, Z., & Jiang, X. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05138 · Cited by 1,062
Intrinsic therapeutic applications of noble metal nanoparticles: past, present and future
Arvizo, R. R., Bhattacharyya, S., Kudgus, R. A., Giri, K., Bhattacharya, R., & Mukherjee, P. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15355f · Cited by 886
Interaction of high molecular weight kininogen, factor XII, and fibrinogen in plasma at interfaces
Vroman, L., Adams, A., Fischer, G., & Munoz, P. (1980) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v55.1.156.156 · Cited by 781
On the safety of Aspergillus niger - a review
Schuster, E., Dunn-Coleman, N. S., Frisvad, J. C., & van Dijck, P. W. M. (2002) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-002-1032-6 · Cited by 777
The effect of sedimentation and diffusion on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles
Cho, E. C., Zhang, Q., & Younan Xia, A. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.58 · Cited by 721
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Society T.A.C. Global Cancer Facts & Figures. 3rd Edition. http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsStatistics/global-cancer-facts-figures-3rd-edition (accessed Nov 6)
- Miller, K.D.; Siegel, R.L.; Lin, C.C.; Mariotto, A.B.; Kramer, J.L.; Rowland, J.H.; Stein, K.D.; Alteri, R.; Jemal, A. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistics, 2016. CA: A Cancer J. Clinicians 2016, 46 (2), 231–239.
- Chatterjee, A.; Loganathan, A.; Niroshinee, V.; Abraham, J. Biosynthesis of Lanthanum Nanoparticles Using Green Gram Seeds and Their Effect on Microorganisms. Res. J. Pharmac, Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7 (2), 1462–1470.
- Rashmezad, M.A.; Ali Asgary, E.; Tafvizi, F.; Shandiz, S.; Ataollah, S.; Mirzaie, A. Comparative Study on Cytotoxicity Effect of Biological and Commercial Synthesized Nanosilver on Human Gastric Carcinoma and Normal Lung Fibroblast Cell Lines. Tehran Univ. Med. J. TUMS Publ. 2015, 72 (12), 799–807.
- Varsha, B.; Rajasekar, A.; Kathiravan, G. Xylorious Biogenic Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticle and Their Cytotoxicity Effects Against HT-29 Cell Line. Res. J. Pharm, Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7 (5), 1578–1583.
- Nalavothula, R.; Alwala, J.; Nagati, V.B.; Manthurpadigya, P.R. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Impatiens Balsamina Leaf Extracts and its Characterization and Cytotoxic Studies Using Human Cell Lines. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2015, 7 (5), 2460–2468.
- Sulaiman, G.M.; Mohammad, A.A.; Abdul-Wahed, H.E.; Ismail, M.M. Biosynthesis, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Effects of Silver Nanoparticles Using Rosmarinus Officinalis Extract. Digest J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2013, 8 (1), 34–41.
- 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.003 · DOI
- Singh, H.; Du, J.; Yi, T.-H. Green and Rapid Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Borago Officinalis Leaf Extract: Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 15 (11), 1–7.
- Fathi Karkan, S.; Mohammadhosseini, M.; Panahi, Y.; Milani, M.; Zarghami, N.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Abasi, E.; Hosseini, A.; Davaran, S. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 55 (7), 1–5.
- El-Aziz, A.; Al-Othman, M.; Mahmoud, M.; Metwaly, H. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Fusarium Solani and its Impact on Grain Borne Fungi. Dig J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2015, 10 (2), 655–662.
- Anju Varghese, R.; Anandhi, P.; Arunadevi, R.; Boovisha, A.; Sounthari, P.; Saranya, J.; Parameswari, K.; Chitra, S. Satin Leaf (Chrysophyllum Oliviforme) Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities. J. Pharmac. Sci. Res. 2015, 7 (6), 266–273.
- Gandhiraj, V.; Sathish Kumar, K.; Madhusudhanan, J.; Sandhya, J. Antitumor Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nano Particles From Leaves of Momordica Charantia Against MCF-7 Cell Line. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2015, 8 (7), 351–362.
- Khalifa, K.; Hamouda, R.; Hamza, D.H.A. In Vitro Antitumor Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized by Marine Algae. Dig J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2016, 11 (1), 213–221.
- Chatterjee, A.; Nishanthini, D.; Sandhiya, N.; Abraham, J. Biosynthesis of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Using Vigna Radiata. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016, 28 (11), 85–88.
- Osman, M.; Eid, M.; Khattab, O.; El-Hallouty, S.; Mahmoud, D.; Manawaty, M.-E. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Biosynthesized Ag/CS NP Against MCF7, PC3 and A549 Cancer Cell Lines. Int. J.Pharm. Tech Res. 2015, 8 (5), 1011–1017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jeevanandam, J., Kiew, S. F., Boakye‐Ansah, S., Lau, S. Y., Barhoum, A., Danquah, M. K., & Rodrigues, J. (2022) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d1nr08144f · Cited by 512
Role of plant phytochemicals and microbial enzymes in biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles
Ovais, M., Khalil, A. T., Islam, N. U., Ahmad, I., Ayaz, M., Saravanan, M., Shinwari, Z. K., & Mukherjee, S. (2018) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9146-7 · Cited by 448
Self-citationBiosynthesis of Metal Nanoparticles via Microbial Enzymes: A Mechanistic Approach
Ovais, M., Khalil, A. T., Ayaz, M., Ahmad, I., Nethi, S. K., & Mukherjee, S. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19124100 · Cited by 494
Self-citationSaravanan, M., Barik, S. K., MubarakAli, D., Periakaruppan, P., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2018) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.038 · Cited by 448
Self-citationRecent Progress in Nanostructured Smart Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy: A Review
Khan, M. I., Hossain, I., Hossain, M. K., Rubel, M. H. K., Hossain, K. M., Mahfuz, A. M. U. B., & Anik, M. I. (2022) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.2c00002 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Barabadi, H., Ovais, M., Shinwari, Z. K., & Saravanan, M.
- Affiliations
- Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
- Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
- Mekelle University (ET)
- Corresponding author
- Saravanan, Muthupandian
- Venue
- Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-314
- ISSN
- 1751-7192 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2766097605
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 208
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- green synthesis, biogenic nanoparticles, anticancer activity, cancer theranostics, nanomedicine, plant-mediated nanoparticle synthesis, magnetic drug delivery, photothermal therapy, bioimaging, tumor diagnosis, nanoparticle toxicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-cancer green bionanomaterials: present status and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17518253.2017.1385856
- The paper
- Barabadi, H., Ovais, M., Shinwari, Z. K., & Saravanan, M. (2017). Anti-cancer green bionanomaterials: present status and future prospects. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2017.1385856
