Persons with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease use verbal-instruction technology to manage daily activities: Effects on performance and mood
Abstract
Objective To extend the evaluation of verbal-instruction technology for helping persons with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease recapture daily activities and improve their mood. Methods Two studies targeted two activities (i.e. snack preparation/sharing and shaving) with six and three new participants, respectively. Intervention effects on activity performance were assessed through non-concurrent multiple baseline designs across participants. The impact of intervention (activity) on mood was assessed by recording indices of happiness or indices of unhappiness during activity and non-activity trials. Results The use of a technology providing verbal instructions helped all participants perform the target activities. Performance was largely accurate with seven of the participants. Eight of the participants also showed mood improvement (i.e. increases in indices of happiness or decreases in indices of happiness) during activity. Conclusion These results suggest that the approach reported may be a useful strategy for helping persons with Alzheimer's disease enhance their activity and mood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Domain 3 (independent living) comprised six studies that explored possibly improved occupational performance with the help of technology.
“Domain 3 presents six studies that explored possibly improved occupational performance with the help of technology.30,31,42–45”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Lancioni, G., Singh, N., O’Reilly, M., Zonno, N., Flora, A., Cassano, G., De Vanna, F., De Bari, A. L., Pinto, K., & Minervini, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lancioni, Giulio
- Venue
- Developmental Neurorehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 181-190
- ISSN
- 1363-8491 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8423
- 1751-8431
- OpenAlex
- W2122566879
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, verbal instructions, assistive technology, daily activities, activity performance, mood, happiness, shaving, person-centred care
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Affect, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Self-Help Devices, Severity of Illness Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review