The integration of mindfulness training and health coaching: an exploratory study
Abstract
Coaching has attracted much attention from health professionals interested in collaborative, person-centred approaches to motivating behaviour change. Whilst initial research supports the efficacy of coaching in health contexts, more theoretical and empirical work is needed. Based on recent work demonstrating the important role that mindfulness plays in self-regulation, it was hypothesised that the efficacy of health coaching could be enhanced through the inclusion of Mindfulness Training (MT). To test this, 45 adult were randomly assigned to three health programmes for eight weeks. Using a crossover design, two groups received an alternative delivery of MT and cognitive-behavioural, solution-focused (CB-SF) coaching, whilst the third group participated in a series of health education seminars. Results showed that goal attainment was significantly greater in the facilitative/coaching format than the educative/directive format. No significant differences were found for goal attainment between the two MT/CB-SF conditions suggesting that the delivery sequence had little bearing on outcomes. After reviewing the results, the implications for health professionals are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Goal attainment scaling (GAS) has been widely employed in a variety of settings, including the assessment of mindfulness interventions, to assess program impact.
“GAS have been widely employed in a variety of settings, including the assessment of mindfulness interventions, to assess program impact [51].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Spence, G. B., Cavanagh, M. J., & Grant, A. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Spence, Gordon B.
- Venue
- Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-163
- ISSN
- 1752-1890 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1882
- OpenAlex
- W2088303047
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Coaching An International Journal of Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- mindfulness training, health coaching, behavior change, self-regulation, cognitive behavioural coaching, solution-focused coaching, goal achievement, health education, person-centered approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review