Cited by 55Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityEconomic Theory and InstitutionsHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Cryptocurrencies as market singularities: the strange case of Bitcoin

Open access
Dallyn, Sam·2017·Journal of Cultural Economy

Abstract

Since its creation in 2009, the electronic currency Bitcoin has generated volumes of online debate in the business press. While there have been plenty of economic arguments situating it as a financial bubble about to collapse including from Nobel Prize winning economists, its price value has proven to be more durable than many have predicted. To explain this durability, Karpik’s conception of market singularities is used to understand the Bitcoin phenomenon by outlining the beliefs that maintain Bitcoin’s status as a volatile financial asset. Market singularities are markets for particular kinds of goods and services that are of uncertain and incommensurable value. Singularities markets have communities of followers and a distinctive belief system that ascribes value to a particular product, service, or asset. Developing Karpik’s conception, the paper explores the libertarian political belief system that surrounds Bitcoin’s status as a financial asset. I also outline some political tensions within the electronic currency community concerning governance and centralisation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17530350.2017.1315541

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is confirmation of the libertarian political belief system that underlies bitcoin's status, but this is not fully unified and there are political tensions within the community concerning governance and centralisation.

    “There is con fi rmation of the libertarian political belief system that underlies bitcoin ' s status but this is not fully uni fi ed and there are some political tensions within the community concerning governance and centralisation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dallyn, S.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Dallyn, Sam
Venue
Journal of Cultural Economy
Published
2017-04-25
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
462-473
ISSN
  • 1753-0350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0369
OpenAlex
W2608885835
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7
FWCI
17.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Cultural Economy (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Keywords
Bitcoin, cryptocurrency, asset price bubbles, belief systems, libertarianism, electronic money, governance, centralization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review