Cited by 89Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceGender, Feminism, and MediaGender and Feminist Studies

Interrogating the “incel menace”: assessing the threat of male supremacy in terrorism studies

DeCook, Julia R., Kelly, Megan·2022·Critical Studies on Terrorism

Abstract

Following a series of deadly attacks, and increasingly in recent years, incels have entered not only the public lexicon but also piqued scholarly interest, especially in terrorism research and programmes aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE). However, much of the current analyses largely interpret incel communities as homogenous, and in doing so ignore the complex and often contradictory nature of incel communities. CVE recommendations made by these scholars are often founded on misconceptions of incel identity and community. Through a critical feminist lens, in this article we argue that the focus on incels should seek to understand the role of male supremacy, antifeminism, and misogyny in society. Additionally, we argue against the trend of attempting to classify and securitise incels as a unique form of misogynistic violence, and identify the dangers of a lack of focus on male supremacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17539153.2021.2005099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 89

Authors
DeCook, J. R., & Kelly, M.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
DeCook, Julia R.
Venue
Critical Studies on Terrorism
Published
2021-12-02
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
706-726
ISSN
  • 1753-9153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-9161
OpenAlex
W3215151055
Cited by
89
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Studies on Terrorism (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
incels, male supremacy, anti-feminism, misogyny, countering violent extremism, incel community, securitization, critical feminism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review