Cited by 43Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Attentional Control and Executive Function

Open access
Hopfinger, Joseph B., Slotnick, Scott D.·2020·Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The processes of attentional control and executive function are critical for navigating and operating efficiently in everyday life, and deficits in these core processes have serious consequences. Despite a long history of research into these topics, much is still unknown about the brain mechanisms supporting these processes. This special issue of Cognitive Neuroscience: Current Debates, Research & Reports presents nine new empirical papers investigating the dynamic neural mechanisms of attentional selection, working memory, and executive control. The papers in this special issue utilize electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods, along with advanced analysis techniques, to identify the neural substrates and dynamic mechanisms underlying the orienting and shifting of attention, as well as the representation and maintenance of information in working memory. These articles inform theories of attentional selection by providing a deeper understanding of social influences on the allocation of attention as well as illuminating the role of selection history in biasing neural activity and behavior. Finally, the research presented here has broader impacts on the field of cognitive neuroscience, as results from studies investigating the coupling between bands of oscillatory neural activity provide exciting new insights into the coordination between widespread brain networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17588928.2019.1682985

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.1000 · DOI
  2. Posner M., 1984, Attention and performance X

Metadata

Authors
Hopfinger, J. B., & Slotnick, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Hopfinger, Joseph B.
Venue
Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2019-11-18
Volume
11
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-4
ISSN
  • 1758-8928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8936
OpenAlex
W2989585585
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
attentional control, executive function, selective attention, working memory, attentional orienting, attentional shift, selection history, neural correlates, neural oscillations
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Humans, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review