The dynamic and task-dependent representational transformation between the motor and sensory systems during speech production
Abstract
The motor and sensory systems work collaboratively to fulfill cognitive tasks, such as speech. For example, it has been hypothesized that neural signals generated in the motor system can transfer directly to the sensory system along a neural pathway (termed as motor-to-sensory transformation). Previous studies have demonstrated that the motor-to-sensory transformation is crucial for speech production. However, it is still unclear how neural representation dynamically evolves among distinct neural systems and how such representational transformation depends on task demand and the degrees of motor involvement. Using three speech tasks - overt articulation, silent articulation, and imagined articulation, the present fMRI study systematically investigated the representational formats and their dynamics in the motor-to-sensory transformation. Frontal-parietal-temporal neural pathways were observed in all three speech tasks in univariate analyses. The extent of the motor-to-sensory transformation network differed when the degrees of motor engagement varied among tasks. The representational similarity analysis (RSA) revealed that articulatory and acoustic information was represented in motor and auditory regions, respectively, in all three tasks. Moreover, articulatory information was cross-represented in the somatosensory and auditory regions in overt and silent articulation tasks. These results provided evidence for the dynamics and task-dependent transformation between representa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Precise neural differences between inner and produced speech remain elusive.
“Precise neural differences between inner and produced speech remain elusive25,32,47,48.”
From Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses (2025) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Tian, X.
- Affiliations
- New York University Shanghai (CN)
- Tianjin Normal University (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Xing
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-07-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 194-204
- ISSN
- 1758-8928 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-8936
- OpenAlex
- W3046129981
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31500914)
- Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (Base B16018)
- Major Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (15JC1400104 and 17JC1404104)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- speech production, representational similarity, articulatory representation, auditory representation, motor engagement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Auditory Cortex, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Somatosensory Cortex, Speech, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review