Cited by 20Bioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBiofuel production and bioconversionForest Biomass Utilization and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential leverage points for development of the cellulosic ethanol industry supply chain

Open access
Newes, Emily K., Bush, Brian W., Peck, Corey T., Peterson, Steven O.·2015·Biofuels

Abstract

The potential long-term impacts and systemic effects of incentives are of great interest to the biofuels industry and decision makers, particularly with regards to forthcoming mandates for biofuels. We have used the Biomass Scenario Model (BSM) to build a theoretical understanding of the role of incentives on the evolution of the biomass-to-biofuels market. It models a broad range of biofuels such as renewable gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel. In this paper, we focus on cellulosic ethanol as we describe model-based insights into potential incentives that are aimed at stimulating industry growth while tempering overall incentive-related government expenditures. Subsequent research can test the key insights gained through BSM simulations against actual policy implementation and actual outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17597269.2015.1039452

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2008, Office of the biomass program, energy efficiency and renewable energy. Multi-Year program plan March 2008
  2. Pelkmans L, 2008, Inventory of biofuel policy measures and their impact on the market
  3. Powers M, Internet
  4. MacDonald T, Internet
  5. Benson T, Tracing connections: voices of systems thinkers
  6. Bush B, 2013, Internet
  7. Peterson S, 2013, Internet, 79
  8. Lin Y, Internet
  9. Vimmerstedt L, 2015, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref, 9, 158

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Newes, E. K., Bush, B. W., Peck, C. T., & Peterson, S. O.
Affiliations
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Corresponding author
Newes, Emily K.
Venue
Biofuels
Published
2015-03-04
Volume
6
Issue
1-2
Pages
21-29
ISSN
  • 1759-7269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-7277
OpenAlex
W2336230589
Cited by
20
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Biofuels (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Keywords
cellulosic ethanol, biofuel industry, supply chain development, policy incentives, biofuel mandates, government spending, renewable gasoline, renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel, industry growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review