Peer-facilitated learning: Students' experiences
Abstract
This article explores first-year students’ motivation for attending peer-facilitated learning (PFL) sessions at a University of Technology, and how they benefit from it. Studies have shown better academic performance for students attending PFL sessions; however, little attention has been dedicated to questioning what else outside of subject knowledge is being disseminated during these sessions; what motivates students to attend these sessions; and what students benefit from attending these sessions. Research has revealed that the majority of first-year students experience challenges with the transition between high school and university. Consequently, first-year experience has become the focus of higher education institutions worldwide. This situation calls for an effective intervention programme such as PFL to assist first-year students with the challenges of transition. The findings of this study contrary to popular literature that highlights academic success as the focus of PFL, revealed that students demonstrate a strong inclination to soft skills and social interactions as the main motivation for attending PFL sessions. This calls for a re-evaluation on how PFL support should be organised especially for first-year students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learners who receive peer-facilitated learning are motivated and engage more in the learning material.
“In addition, it is reported that learners who receive peer-facilitated learning are motivated and engage more in the learning material, as they find it is easier to ask questions while they are being taught or responded to by students of similar age (Mkonto, 2018).”
From The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning (2023) · cites this paper as Mkonto, 2018
Prior studies show that peer-facilitated learning could enhance students' learning outcomes and lead to positive learning attitudes.
“This result is similar to existing studies showing that peer-facilitated learning could enhance students ' learning outcomes (Karademir, Erdo ˘ gdu & G ¨ okçearslan, 2017; Mahdi, 2006; Mkonto, 2018), and lead to students ' positive learning attitudes (Brown & Rode, 2018; Won & Choi, 2017).”
From The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning (2023) · cites this paper as Mkonto, 2018
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tsai, C.-W., Lin, M. Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-P., Lee, L.-Y., Chyr, W.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, J.-W., & Tsai, M.-C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104849 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Peer-facilitated learning is an academic support and effective intervention program which intends to increase learners’ success in at-risk subjects (Mkonto, 2018; Ning & Downing, 2010).”
- Authors
- Mkonto, N.
- Affiliations
- Cape Peninsula University of Technology (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Mkonto, Nosisana
- ORCID
- Mkonto, Nosisana
- Venue
- Africa Education Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 16-31
- ISSN
- 1753-5921 (ISSN-L)
- 1814-6627
- OpenAlex
- W2776509593
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Africa Education Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Practices and Evaluation
- Keywords
- first-year students, student motivation, first-year experience, transition to college, soft skills, social interaction, student support services, technical universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review