Cited by 6Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and EngagementEducation Practices and Evaluation

Peer-facilitated learning: Students' experiences

Mkonto, Nosisana·2018·Africa Education Review

Abstract

This article explores first-year students’ motivation for attending peer-facilitated learning (PFL) sessions at a University of Technology, and how they benefit from it. Studies have shown better academic performance for students attending PFL sessions; however, little attention has been dedicated to questioning what else outside of subject knowledge is being disseminated during these sessions; what motivates students to attend these sessions; and what students benefit from attending these sessions. Research has revealed that the majority of first-year students experience challenges with the transition between high school and university. Consequently, first-year experience has become the focus of higher education institutions worldwide. This situation calls for an effective intervention programme such as PFL to assist first-year students with the challenges of transition. The findings of this study contrary to popular literature that highlights academic success as the focus of PFL, revealed that students demonstrate a strong inclination to soft skills and social interactions as the main motivation for attending PFL sessions. This calls for a re-evaluation on how PFL support should be organised especially for first-year students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/18146627.2016.1224599

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learners who receive peer-facilitated learning are motivated and engage more in the learning material.

    “In addition, it is reported that learners who receive peer-facilitated learning are motivated and engage more in the learning material, as they find it is easier to ask questions while they are being taught or responded to by students of similar age (Mkonto, 2018).”
  • Prior studies show that peer-facilitated learning could enhance students' learning outcomes and lead to positive learning attitudes.

    “This result is similar to existing studies showing that peer-facilitated learning could enhance students ' learning outcomes (Karademir, Erdo ˘ gdu & G ¨ okçearslan, 2017; Mahdi, 2006; Mkonto, 2018), and lead to students ' positive learning attitudes (Brown & Rode, 2018; Won & Choi, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mkonto, N.
Affiliations
Cape Peninsula University of Technology (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mkonto, Nosisana
Venue
Africa Education Review
Published
2017-12-21
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
16-31
ISSN
  • 1753-5921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-6627
OpenAlex
W2776509593
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Africa Education Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Practices and Evaluation
Keywords
first-year students, student motivation, first-year experience, transition to college, soft skills, social interaction, student support services, technical universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review