Cited by 123Multilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The Discourse of Transition: Teachers' Language Ideologies Within Transitional Bilingual Education Programs

Palmer, Deborah·2011·International Multilingual Research Journal

Abstract

Transitional bilingual education (TBE), the most common form of bilingual education in the United States, is too often entrenched in a subtractive, English-dominant ideology. This article explores the conflicting language ideologies of teachers in TBE programs, posing the question, “In what way do TBE teachers' discourses reflect/reinforce and simultaneously confront/counter the ideology of the program model within which they operate?” The article draws on two datasets: interviews with 16 TBE teachers at 6 schools in a large, urban school district in Texas and participant observations; and interviews of 2 TBE teachers as they struggled to move their classrooms away from English dominance and toward a more balanced, additive bilingual space. Based on Bourdieu's conception of legitimate language and Bakhtin's conception of dialogue, the article argues that TBE teachers demonstrate a tension between their stated positive orientations toward bilingualism and the restrictive influences of what is termed the “discourse of transition” as they talk about their students, about their classrooms, and about their own decision-making in TBE programs. Essentially, teachers practicing under the structures of a TBE program struggle to simultaneously offer children a “transitional” and a “bilingual” education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19313152.2011.594019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teachers in dual language settings have largely embraced a predominately monoglossic language ideology, which hinders their efforts to provide an effective transitional and bilingual education to their students.

    “The literature has shown that teachers in dual language settings have largely embraced a predominately monoglossic language ideology, which hinders their efforts to provide an effective transitional and bilingual education to their students (Briceño, 2018; Palmer, 2011; Zúñiga, 2016).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 67 · Cited by 123

Authors
Palmer, D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Palmer, Deborah
Venue
International Multilingual Research Journal
Published
2011-07
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
103-122
ISSN
  • 1931-3152 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-3160
OpenAlex
W2092852876
Cited by
123
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Multilingual Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
transitional bilingual education, language ideology, teacher discourse, additive bilingualism, English language dominance, dialogue, Pierre Bourdieu, Bakhtin, bilingual education policy, teacher decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review