The Discourse of Transition: Teachers' Language Ideologies Within Transitional Bilingual Education Programs
Abstract
Transitional bilingual education (TBE), the most common form of bilingual education in the United States, is too often entrenched in a subtractive, English-dominant ideology. This article explores the conflicting language ideologies of teachers in TBE programs, posing the question, “In what way do TBE teachers' discourses reflect/reinforce and simultaneously confront/counter the ideology of the program model within which they operate?” The article draws on two datasets: interviews with 16 TBE teachers at 6 schools in a large, urban school district in Texas and participant observations; and interviews of 2 TBE teachers as they struggled to move their classrooms away from English dominance and toward a more balanced, additive bilingual space. Based on Bourdieu's conception of legitimate language and Bakhtin's conception of dialogue, the article argues that TBE teachers demonstrate a tension between their stated positive orientations toward bilingualism and the restrictive influences of what is termed the “discourse of transition” as they talk about their students, about their classrooms, and about their own decision-making in TBE programs. Essentially, teachers practicing under the structures of a TBE program struggle to simultaneously offer children a “transitional” and a “bilingual” education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers in dual language settings have largely embraced a predominately monoglossic language ideology, which hinders their efforts to provide an effective transitional and bilingual education to their students.
“The literature has shown that teachers in dual language settings have largely embraced a predominately monoglossic language ideology, which hinders their efforts to provide an effective transitional and bilingual education to their students (Briceño, 2018; Palmer, 2011; Zúñiga, 2016).”
From "We Want Them All to Speak in English … So, no Spanish": Preservice Teachers’ Language Ideologies Towards Emergent Bilinguals (2023) · cites this paper as Palmer, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 67 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Palmer, D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palmer, Deborah
- ORCID
- Palmer, Deborah
- Venue
- International Multilingual Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-122
- ISSN
- 1931-3152 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-3160
- OpenAlex
- W2092852876
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 15.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Multilingual Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- transitional bilingual education, language ideology, teacher discourse, additive bilingualism, English language dominance, dialogue, Pierre Bourdieu, Bakhtin, bilingual education policy, teacher decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review