The Power of the Test for Treatment Effects in Three-Level Cluster Randomized Designs
Abstract
Experiments that involve nested structures often assign entire groups (such as schools) to treatment conditions. Key aspects of the design of such experiments include knowledge of the intraclass correlation structure and the sample sizes necessary to achieve adequate power to detect the treatment effect. This study provides methods for computing power in three-level cluster randomized balanced designs (with two levels of nesting), where, for example, students are nested within classrooms and classrooms are nested within schools and schools are assigned to treatments. The power computations take into account nesting effects at the second (classroom) and at the third (school) level, sample size effects (e.g., number of schools, classrooms, and individuals), and covariate effects (e.g., pretreatment measures). The methods are applicable to quasi-experimental studies that examine group differences in an outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The small sample of countries (N = 41) limits identification of non-significant country-level results (for a .4 effect size at p = .05, statistical power = .75).
“The small sample of countries ( N = 41) limits identification of non-significant countrylevel results (for a .4 effect size at p = .05, statistical power = .75; Konstantopoulos, 2008).”
From Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries: Cross-Cultural Variability (2016) · cites this paper as Konstantopoulos, 2008
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539 · see citing works
Standard Errors and Sample Sizes for Two-Level Research
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986018003237 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X.-F. (2001) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.6.4.387 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries: Cross-Cultural Variability
Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W.-Y., McBride, C., & Mol, S. T. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022115617031 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Exploring cognitive strategies in human-AI interaction: ChatGPT's role in creative tasks
Boers, J., Etty, T., Baars, M., & van Broekhoven, K. (2025) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100095 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Konstantopoulos, S.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Konstantopoulos, Spyros
- Venue
- Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01-23
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-88
- ISSN
- 1934-5739 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-5747
- OpenAlex
- W1971738195
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- statistical power, nested designs, intraclass correlation coefficient, sample size determination, treatment effect estimation, covariate effects, quasi-experimental design, multilevel data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review