Cited by 124Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

The Power of the Test for Treatment Effects in Three-Level Cluster Randomized Designs

Konstantopoulos, Spyros·2008·Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Abstract

Experiments that involve nested structures often assign entire groups (such as schools) to treatment conditions. Key aspects of the design of such experiments include knowledge of the intraclass correlation structure and the sample sizes necessary to achieve adequate power to detect the treatment effect. This study provides methods for computing power in three-level cluster randomized balanced designs (with two levels of nesting), where, for example, students are nested within classrooms and classrooms are nested within schools and schools are assigned to treatments. The power computations take into account nesting effects at the second (classroom) and at the third (school) level, sample size effects (e.g., number of schools, classrooms, and individuals), and covariate effects (e.g., pretreatment measures). The methods are applicable to quasi-experimental studies that examine group differences in an outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19345740701692522

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The small sample of countries (N = 41) limits identification of non-significant country-level results (for a .4 effect size at p = .05, statistical power = .75).

    “The small sample of countries ( N = 41) limits identification of non-significant countrylevel results (for a .4 effect size at p = .05, statistical power = .75; Konstantopoulos, 2008).”

    From Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries: Cross-Cultural Variability (2016) · cites this paper as Konstantopoulos, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konstantopoulos, S.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Konstantopoulos, Spyros
Venue
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Published
2008-01-23
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
66-88
ISSN
  • 1934-5739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5747
OpenAlex
W1971738195
Cited by
124
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
statistical power, nested designs, intraclass correlation coefficient, sample size determination, treatment effect estimation, covariate effects, quasi-experimental design, multilevel data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review