Cited by 92Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Assessment and ImprovementSchool Choice and Performance

Enhancing Secondary School Instruction and Student Achievement: Replication and Extension of the My Teaching Partner-Secondary Intervention

Open access
Allen, Joseph P., Hafen, Christopher A., Gregory, Anne C., Mikami, Amori Y., Pianta, Robert·2015·Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Abstract

My Teaching Partner-Secondary (MTP-S) is a web-mediated coaching intervention, which an initial randomized trial, primarily in middle schools, found to improve teacher-student interactions and student achievement. Given the dearth of validated teacher development interventions showing consistent effects, we sought to both replicate and extend these findings with a modified version of the program in a predominantly high school population, and in a more urban, sociodemographically diverse school district. MTP-S produced substantial gains in student achievement across 86 secondary school classrooms involving 1,194 students. Gains were robust across subject areas and equivalent to moving the average student from the 50th to the 59th percentile in achievement scores. Results suggest that MTP-S can enhance student outcomes across diverse settings and implementation modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19345747.2015.1017680

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical evidence for instructional coaching includes replicated randomised controlled trials and evidence from AB testing.

    “The empirical evidence for instructional coaching also includes replicated randomised controlled trials (Allen et al., 2011;Allen et al., 2015) and evidence from AB testing (Albornoz et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 92

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Allen JP Gregory A Mikami AY Lun J Hamre BK Pianta RC Observations of effective teaching in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the CLASS-S School Psychology Review 2013 42 1 76 98 PMC5602545 28931966
  2. Allen JP Pianta RC Gregory A Mikami AY Lun J An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement Science 2011 333 6045 1034 1037 21852503 PMC3387786
  3. Battistich V Watson M Solomon D Lewis C Schaps E Beyond the three R’s: A broader agenda for school reform The Elementary School Journal 1999 99 5 415 432
  4. Fishman B Konstantopoulos S Kubitskey BW Vath R Park G Johnson H Edelson DC Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation Journal of Teacher Education 2013 64 5 426 438
  5. Forman SG Shapiro ES Codding RS Gonzales JE Reddy LA Rosenfield SA Stoiber KC Implementation science and school psychology School Psychology Quarterly 2013 28 2 77 100 23586516
  6. Francis G The psychology of replication and replication in psychology Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012 7 6 585 594 26168115
  7. Gregory A Allen JP Mikami A Hafen CA Pianta RC Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school Psychology in the Schools 2014a 51 143 163 PMC5319794 28232767
  8. Gregory A Allen JP Mikami A Hafen CA Pianta RC Losen DJ The promise of a teacher professional development program in reducing the racial disparity in classroom discipline referrals Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion 2014b New York, NY Teachers College Press 166 179
  9. Hafen C Allen JP Mikami AY Anne G Hamre BK Pianta RC The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary classrooms Journal of Youth & Adolescence 2012 41 3 245 255 22198156 PMC3385857
  10. Hambleton RK Crocker L Cruse K Dodd B Plake BS Poggio J Review of selected technical characteristics of the Virginia Standard of Learning (SOL) assessments 2000 Richmond, VA Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education
  11. Hamre BK Pianta RC Meece J Eccles J Classroom environments and developmental processes: Conceptualization & measurement Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development 2010 New York, NY Routledge 25 41
  12. Hamre BK Pianta RC Mashburn AJ Downer JT Promoting young children’s social competence through the preschool PATHS curriculum and MyTeachingPartner professional development resources Early Education & Development 2012 23 6 809 832 PMC8423357 34497452
  13. National Research Council Achieving high educational standards for all 2002 Washington, DC National Academy Press
  14. Odden AR Archibals S Femanich M Gallagher HA A cost framework for professional development Journal of Education Finance 2002 28 1 51 74
  15. Pianta RC Cicchetti D Classroom processes and teacher-student interaction: Integrations with a developmental psychopathology perspective Developmental psychopathology New York, NY Wiley (in press)
  16. Pianta RC Allen JP Shinn M Yoshikawa H Building capacity for positive youth development in secondary schools: Teachers and their interactions with students Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs 2009 New York, NY Oxford University Press 21 40
  17. Pianta RC Mashburn AJ Downer JT Hamre BK Justice L Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher-child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2008b 23 4 431 451 25717217 PMC4337032
  18. Raudenbush SW Bryk A Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
  19. What Works Clearinghouse 2012 WWC quick review of the report “An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement” Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/quick_reviews/myteachingpartner_022212.pdf PMC3387786 21852503

Authors
Allen, J. P., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A. C., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Allen, Joseph P.
Venue
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Published
2015-04-11
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
475-489
ISSN
  • 1934-5739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5747
OpenAlex
W1974857108
Cited by
92
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
18.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01hd058305-17a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058066)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD058305)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
teacher-student relationship, academic performance, secondary school teachers, secondary school classrooms, urban schools, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review