Cited by 21Mathematics Education and ProgramsHigher Education Research StudiesMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

Can low-cost online summer math programs improve student preparation for college-level math? Evidence from randomized experiments at three universities

Chingos, Matthew M., Griffiths, Rebecca J., Mulhern, Christine·2017·Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Abstract

Every year many students enter college without the math preparation needed to succeed in their desired programs of study. Many of these students struggle to catch up, especially those who are required to take remedial math courses before entering college-level math. Increasing the number of students who begin at the appropriate level of math has become an important focus for educators and policymakers. We conducted randomized experiments of low-cost online summer math programs at three universities to test whether this type of intervention can increase access to math preparation, improve placement and enrollment in fall math classes, and improve performance in first-year math courses. Students who received the intervention engaged with the platform, though at relatively low rates, and were more likely to retake the placement test and improve their scores than students in the control group. However, these improved scores did not translate into enrolling in higher level math courses, obtaining more math credits, or improving grades in math-related courses during the first year of college. Thus, providing students access to this online tool did not improve their math skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19345747.2017.1300362

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chingos, M. M., Griffiths, R. J., & Mulhern, C.
Affiliations
  • Urban Institute (US)
  • SRI International (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mulhern, Christine
Venue
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Published
2017-04-14
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
794-816
ISSN
  • 1934-5739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5747
OpenAlex
W2606167248
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
higher education access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review