The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Residents’ impact perceptions of and attitudes towards tourism development: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Applying a meta-analysis approach, this study examines the applicability of SET on explaining residents’ impact perceptions of and attitudes toward tourism development. Findings confirm the applicability of SET in tourism impact studies when assessing the impacts of perceived benefits (positive impacts) on support. Findings reveal that perceived benefits produce substantial effects on support while perceived costs (negative impacts) have trivial effects, which suggest that measures and indicators used to assess residents perceptions of perceived costs (negative impacts) may have validity problems. Moreover, a closer examination of the mean effects of five exogenous determinants of impact perceptions reveal that none of those variables have significant effects on the perceptions of negative impacts further suggesting possible problems with the operationalization of negative impact perceptions. Findings clearly suggest that a closer examination of the measurement items used to assess the negative impact perceptions of tourism impacts is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 1×
“Several researchers have addressed the existence of publication bias against statistically nonsignificant results in peer-reviewed journals (Orwin, 1983; Rosenthal, 1979).”
BackgroundA basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793
The Social Psychology of Groups
Kenkel, W. F., Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709294 · Cited by 5,898
Cook, K. S. (2020) · The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology · doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss149.pub2 · Cited by 3,637
Emerson, R. M. (1976) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 · Cited by 3,457
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Event tourism: Definition, evolution, and research
Getz, D. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.017 · Cited by 2,229
The Social Psychology of Groups
de Montlibert, C., Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1960) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3319917 · Cited by 2,174
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1×
“Several researchers have addressed the existence of publication bias against statistically nonsignificant results in peer-reviewed journals (Orwin, 1983; Rosenthal, 1979).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gursoy, D., Ouyang, Z., Nunkoo, R., & Wei, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-17
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-333
- ISSN
- 1936-8623 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-8631
- OpenAlex
- W2892321301
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residents’ impact perceptions of and attitudes towards tourism development: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19368623.2018.1516589
- The paper
- Gursoy, D., Ouyang, Z., Nunkoo, R., & Wei, W. (2019). Residents’ impact perceptions of and attitudes towards tourism development: a meta-analysis. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2018.1516589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
