The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sensory Processing Measure–Preschool (SPM-P)—Part Two: Test–Retest and Collective Collaborative Empowerment, Including a Father's Perspective
Abstract
As a follow-up to “The Sensory Processing Measure–Preschool (SPM-P)—Part One: Description of the Tool and Its Use in the Preschool Environment” (CitationMiller Kuhaneck, Glennon, & Herzberg, 2011/this issue), this case illustrates the use of the SPM-P as a test and retest in promoting understanding of how sensory processing issues drive challenging behaviors. A father's unique perspective illustrates how the SPM-P promotes collaborative empowerment among SPM-P team members, including the occupational therapist, occupational therapy assistant, preschool teacher, paraprofessionals, grandparents. and parents.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The exploratory factor analysis of the American version of the SPM-P showed 8 factors, of which the first explained 20% of the variance, labeled as “problem behaviour;” the second referred to social participation, the third to proprioception, and the fourth to planning and ideation.”
From Assessment of Sensory Processing and Executive Functions in Childhood: Development, Reliability, and Validity of the EPYFEI (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“The SPM-P includes 75 items grouped into eight dimensions: social participation, sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell, proprioception, vestibular, planning, and ideation.”
From Assessment of Sensory Processing and Executive Functions in Childhood: Development, Reliability, and Validity of the EPYFEI (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity
Rouse, M. J., & Harris, D. B. (1964) · Studies in Art Education · doi:10.2307/1319660 · Cited by 513
Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity
Farnsworth, P. R., & Harris, D. B. (1965) · Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/427684 · Cited by 479
Turnbull, A. P., Turbiville, V., & Turnbull, H. R. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529320.029 · Cited by 185
Evolution of the Sensory Integration Frame of Reference
Schaaf, R. C., & Davies, P. L. (2010) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2010.090000 · Cited by 50
Watling, R. L., Koenig, K. P., Schaaf, R. C., et al. (2011) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 34
Glennon, T. J., Miller-Kuhaneck, H., & Herzberg, D. S. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools & Early Intervention · doi:10.1080/19411243.2011.573245 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Blanche E. I., 2010, Proprioception: Relationship between clinical signs and difficulties
- Cermak S., 2010, Lessons learned from international sensory integration-based occupational therapy: Implications for practice at home
- Henry D. A., 2011, Stepping beyond assessments: Linking sensory integration, the sensory processing measures and a Quick Tips school team empowerment approach
- Lane S. J., 2006, Participation and adaptation: An ecocultural perspective
- Marr D., 2009, Sensory stories: Manual & instructions
- Miller Kuhaneck H., 2010, Sensory Processing Measure-Preschool: Manual
- Mollo K., 2008, AOTA: SISIS Quarterly, 33, 1
- Monteiro M. J., 2010, Autism conversations: Evaluating children on the autism spectrum through authentic conversations
- Parham L. D., 2007, Sensory Processing Measure (SPM): Manual
- Watling R., 2011, Occupational therapy practice guidelines for children and adolescents with difficulty processing and integrating sensory information
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Romero-Ayuso, D., Jorquera-Cabrera, S., Segura-Fragoso, A., Toledano-González, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, M. C., & Triviño-Juárez, J. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2018.00071 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Henry, D. A., & McClary, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-70
- ISSN
- 1941-1243 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-1251
- OpenAlex
- W2010918872
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools & Early Intervention (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- sensory processing, preschool children, test-retest reliability, behavioral problems, father's perspective, occupational therapy, early intervention, parental involvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
